journal of experimental psychology applied | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1632 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 days ago

journal of experimental psychology applied

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name j exp psychol appl
Abbreviated Name j exp psychol appl
ISSN 1939-2192
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/xap/index.aspx
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (16 total)

2009
la protección de los derechos del individuo en el derecho internacional: ¿es la selectividad compatible con la universalidad?
;Francisco Orrego Vicuña
Vol. 2 , pp. 113-140
387 views Abstract
2008
alternativas de reparación en el arbitraje internacional de inversiones —un debate entre la teoría y la práctica—
;Nigel Blackaby;Andrea Camargo García
Vol. 1 , pp. 160-181
344 views Abstract
2012
applicability of general international law within the wto dispute settlement system: right to health situation.
;Juan Manuel Medina Amador
Vol. 5 , pp. 93-121
330 views Abstract
2017
environmental protection and investment arbitration: yin and yang?
;Laurence Boisson de Chazournes
Vol. 10 , pp. 371-399
290 views DOI Abstract
2018
sustainable production and trade discrimination: an analysis of the wto
;María Alejandra Calle Saldarriaga
Vol. 11 , pp. -
279 views DOI Abstract
2012
restraining orders and foreigner’s right to respect for privacy and family life in europe
;Rosmerlin Estupiñán Silva
Vol. 5 , pp. 29-58
276 views Abstract
2012
translation of the decision of the international court of justice related to the “application of the interim accord of 13 september 1995” (the former yugoslav republic of macedonia v. greece) judgment
;Ricardo Abello Galvis;Cristhian Ferrer Acuña
Vol. 5 , pp. 397-476
263 views Abstract
2018
Disadvantaged but not dissatisfied: How agency ameliorates negative reactions to unequal pay.
Choshen-Hillel, Shoham;Shaw, Alex;Caruso, Eugene M;
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 578-599
262 views DOI Abstract
2019
Helping consumers to evaluate annual percentage rates (APR) on credit cards.
Chin, Alycia;Bruine de Bruin, Wändi;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 77-87
249 views DOI Abstract
2017
Passive restraint reduces visually induced motion sickness in older adults.
Keshavarz, Behrang;Novak, Alison C;Hettinger, Lawrence J;Stoffregen, Thomas A;Campos, Jennifer L;
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 85-99
240 views DOI Abstract
View All 16 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.