Indexed in Journament

journal of experimental psychology applied

ISSN 1939-2192· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,929 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
16 Articles
Scores higher than 38.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j exp psychol appl
Abbreviated Name j exp psychol appl
ISSN 1939-2192
URL http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/xap/index.aspx

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 46.3 25.8
Innovation 27.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.1 4.2
Content Distribution 63.8 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2009
la protección de los derechos del individuo en el derecho internacional: ¿es la selectividad compatible con la universalidad?
;Francisco Orrego Vicuña
Vol. 2 , pp. 113-140
465 views Abstract
2008
alternativas de reparación en el arbitraje internacional de inversiones —un debate entre la teoría y la práctica—
;Nigel Blackaby;Andrea Camargo García
Vol. 1 , pp. 160-181
413 views Abstract
2012
applicability of general international law within the wto dispute settlement system: right to health situation.
;Juan Manuel Medina Amador
Vol. 5 , pp. 93-121
393 views Abstract
2017
environmental protection and investment arbitration: yin and yang?
;Laurence Boisson de Chazournes
Vol. 10 , pp. 371-399
362 views DOI Abstract
2018
sustainable production and trade discrimination: an analysis of the wto
;María Alejandra Calle Saldarriaga
Vol. 11 , pp. -
331 views DOI Abstract
2012
restraining orders and foreigner’s right to respect for privacy and family life in europe
;Rosmerlin Estupiñán Silva
Vol. 5 , pp. 29-58
322 views Abstract
2019
Helping consumers to evaluate annual percentage rates (APR) on credit cards.
Chin, Alycia;Bruine de Bruin, Wändi;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 77-87
315 views DOI Abstract
2012
translation of the decision of the international court of justice related to the “application of the interim accord of 13 september 1995” (the former yugoslav republic of macedonia v. greece) judgment
;Ricardo Abello Galvis;Cristhian Ferrer Acuña
Vol. 5 , pp. 397-476
311 views Abstract
2018
Disadvantaged but not dissatisfied: How agency ameliorates negative reactions to unequal pay.
Choshen-Hillel, Shoham;Shaw, Alex;Caruso, Eugene M;
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 578-599
307 views DOI Abstract
2017
Passive restraint reduces visually induced motion sickness in older adults.
Keshavarz, Behrang;Novak, Alison C;Hettinger, Lawrence J;Stoffregen, Thomas A;Campos, Jennifer L;
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 85-99
300 views DOI Abstract
2019
Helping consumers to evaluate annual percentage rates (APR) on credit cards.
Chin, Alycia;Bruine de Bruin, Wändi;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 77-87
315 views DOI Abstract
2018
sustainable production and trade discrimination: an analysis of the wto
;María Alejandra Calle Saldarriaga
Vol. 11 , pp. -
331 views DOI Abstract
2018
Disadvantaged but not dissatisfied: How agency ameliorates negative reactions to unequal pay.
Choshen-Hillel, Shoham;Shaw, Alex;Caruso, Eugene M;
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 578-599
307 views DOI Abstract
2017
environmental protection and investment arbitration: yin and yang?
;Laurence Boisson de Chazournes
Vol. 10 , pp. 371-399
362 views DOI Abstract
2017
Passive restraint reduces visually induced motion sickness in older adults.
Keshavarz, Behrang;Novak, Alison C;Hettinger, Lawrence J;Stoffregen, Thomas A;Campos, Jennifer L;
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 85-99
300 views DOI Abstract
2016
the rights of foreign investors over land according to investment protection treaties: a view from latin america
;Nicolás M. Perrone
Vol. 9 , pp. 273-308
67 views DOI Abstract
2015
À vous la terre, et à vous, la mer: à propos de l’étrange sens de l’équité de la cij en l’affaire du différend territorial et maritime (nicaragua c. colombie)
;Rafael A. Prieto Sanjuán
Vol. 8 , pp. 131-165
237 views DOI Abstract
2015
editorial
;Ricardo Abello-Galvis
Vol. 8 , pp. 11-15
41 views
2014
fundamentos y práctica internacional del derecho a la consulta previa, libre e informada a pueblos indígenas
;Luz Ángela Patiño Palacios
Vol. 7 , pp. 69-111
46 views DOI Abstract
2012
translation of the decision of the international court of justice related to the “application of the interim accord of 13 september 1995” (the former yugoslav republic of macedonia v. greece) judgment
;Ricardo Abello Galvis;Cristhian Ferrer Acuña
Vol. 5 , pp. 397-476
311 views Abstract
Journament Score
29.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,929 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

29.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

46.3/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

27.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

63.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.