annals of work exposures and health | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2443 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

annals of work exposures and health

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name ann work expo health
Abbreviated Name ann work expo health
ISSN 2398-7316
Aim and Scope
URL https://academic.oup.com/annweh/issue
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2019
Derivation of Time-Activity Data Using Wearable Cameras and Measures of Personal Inhalation Exposure among Workers at an Informal Electronic-Waste Recovery Site in Ghana.
Laskaris, Zoey;Milando, Chad;Batterman, Stuart;Mukherjee, Bhramar;Basu, Niladri;O'neill, Marie S;Robins, Thomas G;Fobil, Julius N;
381 views DOI Abstract
2020
Eliminating Take-Home Exposures: Recognizing the Role of Occupational Health and Safety in Broader Community Health.
Kalweit, Andrew;Herrick, Robert F;Flynn, Michael A;Spengler, John D;Berko, J Kofi;Levy, Jonathan I;Ceballos, Diana M;
359 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comparison Between a Job-Exposure Matrix (JEM) Score and Self-Reported Exposures for Carrying Heavy Loads Over the Working Lifetime in the CONSTANCES Cohort.
Ngabirano, Laure;Fadel, Marc;Leclerc, Annette;Evanoff, Bradley A;Dale, Ann Marie;Roquelaure, Yves;Descatha, Alexis;
340 views DOI Abstract
2020
Occupational Dermatitis in Welding: Does Nickel Exposure Account for Higher Rates in Women? Analysis of a Canadian Cohort.
Cherry, Nicola;Galarneau, Jean-Michel;
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Semiconductor Work and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Associated with Male Workers: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Choi, Kyung-Hwa;Kim, Hyunjoo;Kim, Myoung-Hee;Kwon, Ho-Jang;
327 views DOI Abstract
2020
Performance Comparison of Four Portable FTIR Instruments for Direct-on-Filter Measurement of Respirable Crystalline Silica.
Ashley, Elizabeth L;Cauda, Emanuele;Chubb, Lauren G;Tuchman, Donald P;Rubinstein, Elaine N;
298 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mapping Occupational Hazards with a Multi-sensor Network in a Heavy-Vehicle Manufacturing Facility
Zuidema, C.
Vol. 63 , pp. 280-293
287 views DOI
2017
Ability to Discriminate Between Sustainable and Unsustainable Heat Stress Exposures-Part 1: WBGT Exposure Limits.
Garzón-Villalba, Ximena P;Wu, Yougui;Ashley, Candi D;Bernard, Thomas E;
Vol. 61 , No. 6 , pp. 611-620
276 views DOI Abstract
2017
An Assessment of the Robustness of the COSHH-Essentials (C-E) Target Airborne Concentration Ranges 15 Years on, and Their Usefulness for Determining Control Measures.
Vaughan, Nicholas P;Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah, Rajadurai;
Vol. 61 , No. 3 , pp. 270-283
253 views DOI Abstract
2015
akulturasi islam dan budaya lokal (memahami nilai-nilai ritual maulid nabi di pekalongan)
;Nihayatur Rohmah
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 1-19
235 views Abstract
View All 14 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.