Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3877 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name Waste Manag Res
Abbreviated Name waste manag res
ISSN 1096-3669
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.sagepub.com/journals/Journal201691/title
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (37 total)

2020
An investigation into solid waste problem in the Egyptian construction industry: A mini-review.
Daoud, Ahmed Osama;Othman, Ayman Ahmed Ezzat;Robinson, Herbert;Bayyati, Ali;
, pp. 734242X20901568
403 views DOI Abstract
2019
Benchmarking performance of solid waste management and recycling systems in East Africa: Comparing Kigali Rwanda with other major cities.
Kabera, Telesphore;Wilson, David C;Nishimwe, Honorine;
Vol. 37 , No. 1_suppl , pp. 58-72
400 views DOI Abstract
2011
Recycling of organic wastes through composting for land applications: a Nigerian experience.
Adekunle, Iheoma M;Adekunle, Adebola A;Akintokun, Aderonke K;Akintokun, Pius O;Arowolo, Toyin A;
Vol. 29 , No. 6 , pp. 582-93
383 views DOI Abstract
2017
Global capacity, potentials and trends of solid waste research and management.
Nwachukwu, Michael A;Ronald, Mersky;Feng, Huan;
Vol. 35 , No. 9 , pp. 923-934
378 views DOI Abstract
2016
analyzing audience awareness in academic writing among undergraduates
;Noor Hanim Rahmat
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 88-95
374 views DOI Abstract
2018
Effect of chicken feather and boron compounds as filler on mechanical and flame retardancy properties of polymer composite materials.
Kuru, D;Akpinar Borazan, A;Guru, M;
Vol. 36 , No. 11 , pp. 1029-1036
370 views DOI Abstract
2012
Solid waste generation and decomposition using compost bin technique in Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
Akinbile, Christopher O;Yusoff, Mohd Suffian;
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 498-505
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Modelling waste generated during construction of buildings using regression analysis.
Teixeira, Eduardo de Carvalho;González, Marco Aurélio Stumpf;Heineck, Luiz Fernando Mälmann;Kern, Andrea Parisi;Bueno, Guilherme Manfredini;
, pp. 734242X19893012
356 views DOI Abstract
2016
fungsi sastra lisan “tanduk” masyarakat genaharjo kabupaten tuban bagi masyarakat pendukungnya
;Suantoko Suantoko
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 246-256
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
An assessment of construction waste management in India: A statistical approach.
Kolaventi, Swarna Swetha;Tezeswi, T P;Siva Kumar, Mvn;
, pp. 734242X19867754
342 views DOI Abstract
View All 37 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.