Indexed in Journament

Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA

ISSN 1096-3669· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.1/100
Journament Score
#8,850
Journament Rank
37
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Waste Manag Res
Abbreviated Name waste manag res
ISSN 1096-3669
URL http://www.sagepub.com/journals/Journal201691/title

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (37)

2020
An investigation into solid waste problem in the Egyptian construction industry: A mini-review.
, pp. 734242X20901568
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Benchmarking performance of solid waste management and recycling systems in East Africa: Comparing Kigali Rwanda with other major cities.
Vol. 37 , No. 1_suppl , pp. 58-72
419 views DOI Abstract
2011
Recycling of organic wastes through composting for land applications: a Nigerian experience.
Vol. 29 , No. 6 , pp. 582-93
413 views DOI Abstract
2017
Global capacity, potentials and trends of solid waste research and management.
Vol. 35 , No. 9 , pp. 923-934
398 views DOI Abstract
2018
Effect of chicken feather and boron compounds as filler on mechanical and flame retardancy properties of polymer composite materials.
Vol. 36 , No. 11 , pp. 1029-1036
392 views DOI Abstract
2016
analyzing audience awareness in academic writing among undergraduates
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 88-95
390 views DOI Abstract
2012
Solid waste generation and decomposition using compost bin technique in Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 498-505
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Modelling waste generated during construction of buildings using regression analysis.
, pp. 734242X19893012
377 views DOI Abstract
2016
fungsi sastra lisan “tanduk” masyarakat genaharjo kabupaten tuban bagi masyarakat pendukungnya
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 246-256
372 views DOI Abstract
2019
An assessment of construction waste management in India: A statistical approach.
, pp. 734242X19867754
364 views DOI Abstract
2020
Environment-friendly technology for recovering cathode materials from spent lithium iron phosphate batteries.
, pp. 734242X20931933
152 views DOI Abstract
2020
A sustainable municipal solid waste system design considering public awareness and education: A case study.
, pp. 734242X20910206
333 views DOI Abstract
2020
An investigation into solid waste problem in the Egyptian construction industry: A mini-review.
, pp. 734242X20901568
420 views DOI Abstract
2020
Demolished concretes recycling by the use of pneumatic jigs.
, pp. 734242X20902835
204 views DOI Abstract
2020
Pyrolysis treatment of nonmetal fraction of waste printed circuit boards: Focusing on the fate of bromine.
, pp. 734242X19894621
286 views DOI Abstract
2020
Application of a methodology to design a municipal waste pre-collection network in real scenarios.
, pp. 734242X19894630
255 views DOI Abstract
2019
Benchmarking performance of solid waste management and recycling systems in East Africa: Comparing Kigali Rwanda with other major cities.
Vol. 37 , No. 1_suppl , pp. 58-72
419 views DOI Abstract
2019
The role of solid waste composting in mitigating climate change in Jordan.
Vol. 37 , No. 8 , pp. 833-842
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
A review of the valorization and management of industrial spent catalyst waste in the context of sustainable practice: The case of the State of Kuwait in parallel to European industry.
Vol. 37 , No. 11 , pp. 1127-1141
285 views DOI Abstract
2019
Modelling waste generated during construction of buildings using regression analysis.
, pp. 734242X19893012
377 views DOI Abstract
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.