anales de edificación | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4759 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

anales de edificación

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name anales de edificación
Abbreviated Name anales de edificación
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2018
Análisis de los resultados del estado de Conservación de 86 Viviendas protegidas de Cehegín = Analysis of results of condition of 86 homes protected Cehegín
Roca, Nuria Rosa;Ruiz, Juan Roldán;Agulló, Mercedes Galiana;
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 21-24
694 views Abstract
2016
Metodología contemporánea de Infraestructuras de Gestión de Proyectos, Prevención de controversias y Análisis de Retrasos = Contemporary Methodology for Infrastructure Project Management, Dispute Avoidance and Delay
Vacanas, Yiannis;Themistocleous, Kyriacos;Agapiou, Athos;Danezis, Chris;
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 12-19
299 views Abstract
2007
the bay of pigs: revisiting two museums
;Peter Read;Marivic Wyndham
Vol. 14 , pp. -
250 views Abstract
2013
anastasia's journeys: two voices in a limited space
;Nicola Pullan
Vol. 20 , pp. 104-114
243 views Abstract
2008
places of the heart: memorials, public history and the state in australia since 1960
;Paul Ashton;Paula Hamilton
Vol. 15 , pp. -
237 views Abstract
2015
'manxness': the uses of heritage on the isle of man
;Elizabeth Catte
Vol. 22 , pp. 8-22
235 views Abstract
2009
<i>people and their pasts</i> edited by paul ashton and hilda kean
;Christopher Castaneda
Vol. 16 , pp. 119-21
226 views
2007
oral histories of a layered landscape: the rushworth oral history project
;Keir Reeves;E. Rebecca Sanders;Gordon Chisholm
Vol. 14 , pp. -
210 views Abstract
2012
arkeologi menurut interpretasi siapa?: mencari tempat untuk arkeologi alternatif di indonesia
;Irmawati Marwoto-Johan
Vol. 19 , pp. 111-121
208 views Abstract
2010
<i>the museum educator's manual: educators share successful techniques</i> by anna johnson et al
;Jennifer Blunden
Vol. 16 , pp. 131-133
196 views
View All 15 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.