future studies research journal: trends and strategies | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6454 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 bulan yang lalu

future studies research journal: trends and strategies

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Pengindeksan
Nama Singkat future studies research journal: trends and strategies
Nama Singkatan future studies research journal: trends and strategies
ISSN
Tujuan dan Ruang Lingkup
URL
Petunjuk untuk Penulis

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (25 total)

2013
Environmental Monitoring in the Small Business: A Case Study on this Process in a Company of the Real Estate Sector
Sutter, Mariana Bassi;Foerster, Letícia;Krakauer, Patrícia Viveiros de Castro;Polo, Edison Fernandes;Almeida, Martinho Isnard Ribeiro de;
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 187-220
395 views Abstract
2016
influence of psychosocial factors on aging among the aged in ihitte-uboma local government area of imo state, nigeria
;Ojukwu M.O.
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 50-57
309 views Abstract
2017
the relationship between cultural identity, intrinsic motivation and pronunciation knowledge of iranian efl learners
;Somayyeh Shabani;Iman Alipoor
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 61-66
296 views DOI Abstract
2016
new setting, same skill: teaching geography students to transfer information literacy skills from familiar to unfamiliar contexts
;Caleb Allison;Kumar Laxman;Mei Lai
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 27-38
296 views Abstract
2013
a literacy exercise: an extracurricular reading program as an intervention to enrich student reading habits in qatar
;Ramzi Nasser
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 61-71
276 views Abstract
2014
field dependence/independence cognitive styles: are they significant at different levels of vocabulary knowledge?
;Mohammad Rostampour;Seyyedeh Mitra Niroomand
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 52-57
271 views Abstract
2013
the effect of training parents in couples’ communication model on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in 4-9 year-old students in isfahan
;Arghavan Shariat;Mokhtar Malekpour;Amir Ghamarani
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 34-37
263 views Abstract
2015
influence of insecurity of school environment on the behaviour of secondary school students in isiala-ngwa north and south local government areas of abia state, nigeria
;Ojukwu M. O.;Nwanma Ahaoma Chigozirim
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 49-55
256 views Abstract
2014
the differences between iranian male and female students in using language learning strategies
;Zahra Sherafat;Pantea Kabiri;Afshin Soori
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 58-62
255 views Abstract
2014
relationship between organizational climate, job stress and job performance officer at state education department
;Turiman Suandi;Ismi Arif Ismail;Zulfadli Othman
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 17-28
247 views Abstract
View All 25 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.