Indexed in Journament

future studies research journal: trends and strategies

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
26.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,766 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
25 Articles
Scores higher than 12% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name future studies research journal: trends and strategies
Abbreviated Name future studies research journal: trends and strategies

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 13.5
Community Impact 6.4
Content Distribution 70.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity — 25.4
Innovation 13.5 24.1
Community Impact 6.4 4.1
Content Distribution 70.2 89.1
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2013
Environmental Monitoring in the Small Business: A Case Study on this Process in a Company of the Real Estate Sector
Sutter, Mariana Bassi;Foerster, Letícia;Krakauer, Patrícia Viveiros de Castro;Polo, Edison Fernandes;Almeida, Martinho Isnard Ribeiro de;
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 187-220
438 views Abstract
2017
the relationship between cultural identity, intrinsic motivation and pronunciation knowledge of iranian efl learners
;Somayyeh Shabani;Iman Alipoor
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 61-66
353 views DOI Abstract
2016
influence of psychosocial factors on aging among the aged in ihitte-uboma local government area of imo state, nigeria
;Ojukwu M.O.
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 50-57
351 views Abstract
2016
new setting, same skill: teaching geography students to transfer information literacy skills from familiar to unfamiliar contexts
;Caleb Allison;Kumar Laxman;Mei Lai
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 27-38
346 views Abstract
2013
the effect of training parents in couples’ communication model on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in 4-9 year-old students in isfahan
;Arghavan Shariat;Mokhtar Malekpour;Amir Ghamarani
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 34-37
327 views Abstract
2013
a literacy exercise: an extracurricular reading program as an intervention to enrich student reading habits in qatar
;Ramzi Nasser
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 61-71
326 views Abstract
2014
relationship between organizational climate, job stress and job performance officer at state education department
;Turiman Suandi;Ismi Arif Ismail;Zulfadli Othman
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 17-28
315 views Abstract
2015
influence of insecurity of school environment on the behaviour of secondary school students in isiala-ngwa north and south local government areas of abia state, nigeria
;Ojukwu M. O.;Nwanma Ahaoma Chigozirim
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 49-55
314 views Abstract
2014
field dependence/independence cognitive styles: are they significant at different levels of vocabulary knowledge?
;Mohammad Rostampour;Seyyedeh Mitra Niroomand
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 52-57
312 views Abstract
2014
the differences between iranian male and female students in using language learning strategies
;Zahra Sherafat;Pantea Kabiri;Afshin Soori
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 58-62
295 views Abstract
2017
assessing iranian student-teachers’ problem-solving ability: a comparison between conventional and problem-based assessment
;Hamid Ashraf;Fatemeh Ahmadi;Javad Gh. Domsky
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 41-46
204 views DOI Abstract
2017
assessment of learning difficulties (ld) in writings of arab learners: a perspective
;Mona Saleh Alanazi
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 73-81
151 views DOI Abstract
2017
processing instruction: a review of issues
;Muhlisin Rasuki
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 1-7
32 views DOI Abstract
2017
instrumental analysis of the english stops produced by arabic speakers of english
;Noureldin Mohamed Abdelaal
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 8-15
145 views DOI Abstract
2017
a thorough scrutiny of elt textbook evaluations: a review inquiry
;Reza Gholami;Nooreen Noordin;Shameem Rafik-Galea
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 82-91
261 views DOI Abstract
2017
promoting information literacy of pre-medical students through project-based learning: a pilot study
;Reya Saliba;Paul Mussleman;Melanie Fernandes;Rachid Bendriss
Vol. 5 , No. 4 , pp. 1-15
257 views DOI Abstract
2017
the relationship between cultural identity, intrinsic motivation and pronunciation knowledge of iranian efl learners
;Somayyeh Shabani;Iman Alipoor
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 61-66
353 views DOI Abstract
2016
exploring the main barriers of technology integration in the english language teaching classroom: a qualitative study
;Rouholllah Khodabandelou;Junny Ei Mon That;Melinda Anne A/P S.Selvaraju;Tan Yan Ken;Zhu Kewen;Zhang Yan;Tan Yan Ning
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 53-58
138 views Abstract
2016
effect of cultural distance on translation of culture-bound texts
;Vahid Rafieyan
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 67-73
221 views Abstract
2016
the effect of practicing mental calculation strategies on teacher candidates’ numeracy proficiency
;Masooma Ali Al Mutawah
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 1-12
234 views Abstract
Journament Score
26.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,766 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

26.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

13.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.