kdi journal of economic policy | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4251 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
60
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

kdi journal of economic policy

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name kdi journal of economic policy
Abbreviated Name kdi journal of economic policy
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (19 total)

2011
Dynamics of Asset Returns Considering Asymmetric Volatility Effects: Evidences from Korean Asset Markets
Yun-Yeong, Kim,;soo, Lee, Jin;
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 93-124
343 views Abstract
2009
Conflict of Interests and Analysts' Forecast
Chang-Gyun, Park,;hoon, Youn, Tae;
Vol. 31 , No. 1 , pp. 239-276
336 views Abstract
2014
Determinants of Fund Investment Flows: Asymmetry between Fund Inflows and Fund Outflows
seok, Shin, In;bin, Cho, Sung;
Vol. 36 , No. 4 , pp. 33-70
294 views Abstract
2015
pengembangan buku pengayaan menulis teks eksposisibermuatan nilai-nilai sosial untuk siswa smp
;Pajar Purnomo
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. -
259 views Abstract
1997
Macroeconomic Effects of Capital Account Liberalization Based on the Neoclassical Growth Model (Written in Korean)
동철, 조,;인철, 김,;
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 3-50
256 views Abstract
1990
Southern Cone Liberalization : Experiences and Lessons (Written in Korean)
원암, 박,;
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 125-151
238 views Abstract
2015
keefektifan penggunaan model sinektik dan model simulasi dalam pembelajaran menulis teks drama berdasarkan gaya belajar pada peserta didik kelas xi sma
;Agung Dias Krisbiono
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. -
231 views Abstract
2014
pengembangan bahan ajar menyimak berbasis multimedia interaktif dalam model belajar mandiri untuk sekolah menengah pertama
;Eko Iman Sugiyono
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. -
202 views Abstract
2003
Fiscal policy and monetary integration in Europe
Jordi Galı́, Roberto Perotti
23 views DOI Abstract
2002
Corporate income tax reforms and international tax competition
Michael Devereux, Richard Griffith, Alexander Klemm
19 views DOI Abstract
View All 19 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
60
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.