glasnik etnografskog instituta sanu | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2352 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

glasnik etnografskog instituta sanu

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name glasnik etnografskog instituta sanu
Abbreviated Name glasnik etnografskog instituta sanu
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (12 total)

2010
Birth of Olympic flame: Ancient Greece and European identity (II)
Miroslava, Malešević;
Vol. 58 , No. 1 , pp. 7-25
396 views Abstract
2013
methodology of isfahan tobacco use prevention program: first phase
;Hamidreza Roohafza;Kamal Heidari;Razieh Omidi;Tahereh Alinia;Fereshteh Rajabi;Saeid Bagheri;Rasoul Khormian Isfahani;Masoumeh Sadeghi
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
357 views DOI Abstract
2006
Christian identity of secular Europe
Miroslava, Malešević;
Vol. 2006 , No. 54 , pp. 69-86
355 views Abstract
2014
dental sealants: knowledge, value, opinion, and practice among dental professionals of bathinda city, india
;Kailash Asawa;Vivek V. Gupta;Mridula Tak;Ramesh Nagarajappa;Pulkit Chaturvedi;Salil Bapat;Prashant Mishra;Santanu Sen Roy
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
343 views DOI Abstract
2008
Professions of Risan population according to 1704 land-registry
Dragana, Radojičić;
Vol. 56 , No. 1 , pp. 211-226
329 views Abstract
2016
prevalence and associated factors of insulin resistance in adults from maracaibo city, venezuela
;Valmore Bermudez;Juan Salazar;María Sofía Martínez;Mervin Chávez-Castillo;Luis Carlos Olivar;María José Calvo;Jim Palmar;Jordan Bautista;Eduardo Ramos;Mayela Cabrera;Freddy Pachano;Joselyn Rojas
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
321 views DOI Abstract
2013
an overview of hiv prevention interventions for people who inject drugs in tanzania
;Eric A. Ratliff;Sheryl A. McCurdy;Jessie K. K. Mbwambo;Barrot H. Lambdin;Ancella Voets;Sandrine Pont;Haruka Maruyama;Gad P. Kilonzo
Vol. 2013 , pp. -
300 views DOI Abstract
2016
examining implementation of tobacco control policy at the district level: a case study analysis from a high burden state in india
;Divya Persai;Rajmohan Panda;Adyya Gupta
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
286 views DOI Abstract
2014
occupational exposure to hiv: perceptions and preventive practices of indian nursing students
;Siddharudha Shivalli
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
201 views DOI Abstract
2012
pertussis epidemiology in greece and emerging risk groups during the vaccination era (1980–2008)
;Maria Theodoridou;Georgia Dargenta;Maria Aptouramani;Panagiotis Papastergiou;Anna Katsiaflaka;Kalliopi Theodoridou;Christos Hadjichristodoulou
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
190 views DOI Abstract
View All 12 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.