Indexed in Journament

environmental management

ISSN 1432-1009· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
48.5 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #239 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
84 Articles
Scores higher than 99.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name environ manage
Abbreviated Name environ manage
ISSN 1432-1009
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/267

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for environmental management
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.5
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 60.0 3.0
Diversity 76.4 26.4
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 11.4 4.5
Content Distribution 63.9 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (84)

postural balance and functional independence of elderly people according to gender and age: cross-sectional study
Vol. 135 , No. 3 , pp. 260-265
562 views DOI Abstract
2017
use of a child health surveillance instrument focusing on growth. a cross-sectional study
, pp. -
530 views DOI Abstract
2017
relationship between total and segmental bone mineral density and different domains of physical activity among children and adolescents: cross-sectional study
, pp. -
483 views DOI Abstract
2020
Perceptions and Behaviors of Indigenous Populations Regarding Illegal Use of Protected Area Resources in East Africa's Mountain Gorilla Landscape.
461 views DOI Abstract
2017
flexible bronchoscopy and mechanical ventilation in managing mounier-kuhn syndrome: a case report
, pp. -
456 views DOI Abstract
1998
Solid Waste Management in Nigeria: Problems and Issues.
Vol. 22 , No. 6 , pp. 849-56
452 views Abstract
2017
Do Riparian Buffers Protect Stream Invertebrate Communities in South American Atlantic Forest Agricultural Areas?
Vol. 60 , No. 6 , pp. 1155-1170
444 views DOI Abstract
2025
Integrated Assessment of Cost-Effective Water Quality Improvements in the Minnesota River Basin: Combining Stated Preferences and Simulation-Optimization Approaches.
111 views DOI Abstract
2020
Amenity Migration and Public Lands: Rise of the Protected Areas.
284 views DOI Abstract
2020
Mapping Adolescents' Sense of Place and Perceptions of Change in an Urban-Rural Transition Area.
301 views DOI Abstract
2020
Perceptions and Behaviors of Indigenous Populations Regarding Illegal Use of Protected Area Resources in East Africa's Mountain Gorilla Landscape.
461 views DOI Abstract
2020
Groundwater Management in Coastal Areas through Landscape Scale Planning: A Systematic Literature Review.
422 views DOI Abstract
2019
Informal Emptying Business in Mandalay: Its Reasons and Financial Impacts.
236 views DOI Abstract
2019
Energy Consumption, Carbon Emissions and Global Warming Potential of Wolfberry Production in Jingtai Oasis, Gansu Province, China.
Vol. 64 , No. 6 , pp. 772-782
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Farmer Perceptions of Climate Change, Observed Trends and Adaptation of Agriculture in Pakistan.
Vol. 63 , No. 1 , pp. 110-123
323 views DOI Abstract
2019
Journament Score
48.5/100 · Below Average
Ranked #239 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

48.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

76.4/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

11.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

63.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.