journal of the saudi heart association | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1883 / 33,957
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of the saudi heart association

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name j saudi heart assoc
Abbreviated Name j saudi heart assoc
ISSN 1016-7315
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-the-saudi-heart-association
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2013
Clinico-radiological profile of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia at a tertiary care center: Two year experience.
Shaheen, Feroze;Iqbal, Khurshid;Hafeez, Imran;Choh, Naseer A;Tramboo, Nisar A;Lone, Ajaz;Iqbal, Shamim;Ahmed, Wasim;Gupta, Amit;
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 79-84
325 views DOI Abstract
2009
carácterísticas histológicas de piel cultivada in vitro histological characteristics of skin culture in vitro
;Arango;C I Chamorro;L M Restrepo;L A Correa;J Henao
Vol. 90 , No. 4 , pp. 00-00
252 views Abstract
2008
progresión a necrólisis epidérmica tóxica por uso de lamotrigina: a propósito de un caso progression to toxic epidermal necrolysis by using lamotrigina: in connection of a case
;M X Andreoli;M Tellez;A Guglielmone;C M Velázquez;V N Dilsizian
Vol. 89 , No. 3 , pp. 188-192
170 views Abstract
2011
micosis fungoide intersticial: diagnóstico diferencial con el granuloma anular intersticial interstitial mycosis fungoides: differential diagnosis with interstitial granuloma annulare
;RE Achenbach;LJA Lococo;GF Sánchez;S Monroy;MI Jorge;EH Pittaro
Vol. 92 , No. 2 , pp. 00-00
167 views Abstract
2012
aspectos clínico-epidemiológicos sobre pediculosis capitis en arenales, estado falcón, venezuela clinical and epidemiological aspects on pediculosis capitis in, falcon state, venezuela
;D Cazorla PerfettI;J Cuencas Talavera;M Acosta Quintero;P Morales Moreno
Vol. 93 , No. 1 , pp. 0-
164 views Abstract
2009
evaluación en educación médica continua evaluation in continua medical education
;
Vol. 90 , No. 3 , pp. 182-184
150 views
2011
;Graciela Mirta Ferraro
Vol. 92 , No. 2 , pp. 00-00
148 views
2007
<title language="lat">erythema elevatum diutinum
;A M Lorenz;M I Garlatti;M S Romano;L Bollea;J Anzorena
Vol. 88 , No. 2 , pp. 82-87
145 views Abstract
2010
sarna humana: el ácaro y sus circunstancias human scabies: the mite and its circumstances
;GM D'Atri;ME Candiz;MS Lois;EJ Restifo
Vol. 91 , No. 1 , pp. 00-00
74 views Abstract
2010
psoriasis y notalgia parestésica psoriasis and notalgia paresthetica
;C Farfan;EJ Restifo
Vol. 91 , No. 4 , pp. 10-14
58 views Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.