ACS omega | Journament

Journal Ranking

#37 / 33,810
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
44.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
32
Accessibility
45
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
50
Community Impact
39
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 10 hours ago

ACS omega

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name ACS Omega
Abbreviated Name acsom
ISSN 2470-1343
Aim and Scope
Journal Scope ACS Omega is an open-access global publication for scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact. Vision Statement ACS Omega is a global open-access journal for the publication of scientific articles that describe new findings in chemistry and interfacing areas of science, without any perceived evaluation of immediate impact. Articles in ACS Omega should advance the frontiers of science through original ideas, even if the full significance is not known. ACS Omega disseminates this knowledge globally and quickly by immediately making all accepted articles open access in perpetuity. Papers published in ACS Omega are therefore available to a much wider readership that includes industry, policy institutions, the media and the general public, in addition to the traditional academic sector.
URL https://pubs.acs.org/journal/acsodf
Author Instructions https://pubs.acs.org/page/acsodf/submission/authors.html
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 08, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (475 total)

2018
[Cu(TPMA)(Phen)](ClO): Metallodrug Nanocontainer Delivery and Membrane Lipidomics of a Neuroblastoma Cell Line Coupled with a Liposome Biomimetic Model Focusing on Fatty Acid Reactivity.
Vol. 3 , No. 11 , pp. 15952-15965
997 views DOI Abstract
2018
Na-Montmorillonite-Dispersed Sustainable Polymer Nanocomposite Hydrogel Films for Anticancer Drug Delivery
Vol. 3 , No. 11 , pp. 15809-15820
759 views
2019
Star-Shaped ESIPT-Active Mechanoresponsive Luminescent AIEgen and Its On-Off-On Emissive Response to Cu/S.
Vol. 4 , No. 7 , pp. 12459-12469
754 views DOI Abstract
2019
Preparation and Comparison of Reduced Graphene Oxide and Carbon Nanotubes as Fillers in Conductive Natural Rubber for Flexible Electronics.
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 3458-3468
715 views DOI Abstract
2019
Catalytic Properties of Heusler Alloys for Steam Reforming of Methanol.
Vol. 4 , No. 26 , pp. 21666-21674
715 views DOI Abstract
2019
Novel Sugar Alcohol/Carbonized Kapok Fiber Composites as Form-Stable Phase-Change Materials with Exceptionally High Latent Heat for Thermal Energy Storage.
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 4848-4855
704 views DOI Abstract
2020
Gold Nanoshell-Linear Tetrapyrrole Conjugates for Near Infrared-Activated Dual Photodynamic and Photothermal Therapies.
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 926-940
688 views DOI Abstract
2019
P-MAPA and IL-12 Differentially Regulate Proteins Associated with Ovarian Cancer Progression: A Proteomic Study.
Vol. 4 , No. 26 , pp. 21761-21777
684 views DOI Abstract
2018
Biowaste-Derived Hydroxyapatite for Effective Removal of Reactive Yellow 4 Dye: Equilibrium, Kinetic, and Thermodynamic Studies.
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 1991-2000
647 views DOI Abstract
2020
Crowd-Sourced Chemistry: Considerations for Building a Standardized Database to Improve Omic Analyses.
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 980-985
611 views DOI Abstract
44
Overall
Below Average
32
45
30
50
39
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

44.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

32.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

45.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

50.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.