iimb management review | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3704 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

iimb management review

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name iimb management review
Abbreviated Name iimb management review
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (28 total)

2018
sulfur cave (romania), an extreme environment with microbial mats in a co2-h2s/o2 gas chemocline dominated by mycobacteria
;Serban M. Sarbu;Joost W. Aerts;Jean-François Flot;Rob J.M. Van Spanning;Calin Baciu;Artur Ionescu;Boglárka M. Kis;Reka Incze;Sándor Sikó-Barabási;Zoltan Para;Botond Hegyeli;Nicu-Viorel Atudorei;Casey Barr;Kenneth Nealson;Ferenc L. Forray;Cristian Lascu;Emily J. Fleming;Wilbert Bitter;Radu Popa
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 173-187
416 views DOI Abstract
2009
exploring the secrets of the three-dimensional architecture of phototrophic biofilms in caves
;Roldàn Monica;Hernàndez-Mariné Mariona
Vol. 38 , No. 1 , pp. 41-53
343 views Abstract
2018
bacterial diversity associated with mineral substrates and hot springs from caves and tunnels of the naica underground system (chihuahua, mexico)
;Adriana Espino del Castillo;Hugo Beraldi-Campesi;Patricia Amador-Lemus;Hiram Isaac Beltrán;Sylvie Le Borgne
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 213-227
287 views DOI Abstract
2019
An analysis of NPAs of Indian banks: Using a comprehensive framework of 31 financial ratios
Bawa, J.
Vol. 31 , pp. 51-62
281 views DOI
2005
cavity-based secondary mineralization in volcanic tuffs of yucca mountain, nevada: a new type of the polymineral vadose speleothem, or a hydrothermal deposit?
;Dublyansky Yuri V.;Smirnov Sergey Z.
Vol. 34 , No. 1-2 , pp. 25-44
280 views Abstract
2017
bat urea-derived minerals in arid environment. first identification of allantoin, c4h6n4o3, in kahf kharrat najem cave, united arab emirates
;Philippe Audra;Pavel Bosák;Fernando Gázquez;Didier Cailhol;Roman Skála;Lenka Lisá;Šárka Jonášová;Amos Frumkin;Martin Knez;Tadej Slabe;Nadja Zupan Hajna;Asma Al-Farraj
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 81-92
279 views DOI Abstract
2019
Investor sentiment and its role in asset pricing: An empirical study for India
Pandey, P.
Vol. 31 , pp. 127-144
265 views DOI
2013
Sustainable business models and the automotive industry: A commentary
Wells, Peter;
Vol. 25 , No. 4 , pp. 228-239
262 views Abstract
2013
A minimum wage solution to halving world poverty by 2015: A stakeholder approach
Ashta, Arvind;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 6-18
252 views Abstract
2013
natural and anthropogenic factors which inf luence aerosol distribution in ingleborough show cave, uk
;Smith Andrew C.;Wynn Peter M.;Barker Philip A.
Vol. 42 , No. 1 , pp. 49-56
238 views Abstract
View All 28 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.