The Journal of emergency medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#88 / 33,854
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
50
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 18 hours ago

The Journal of emergency medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi scopus ulakbim
Short Name J Emerg Med
Abbreviated Name j emerg med
ISSN 0736-4679
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (50 total)

2014
Hemostatic resuscitation is neither hemostatic nor resuscitative in trauma hemorrhage: Khan S, Brohi K, Chana M, et al. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;76:561-8.
Dixon, J.
Vol. 46 , pp. 877-878
585 views DOI
2016
comparison of smoothness-constrained and geostatistically based cross-borehole electrical resistivity tomography for characterization of solute tracer plumes
;Andreas Englert;Andreas Kemna;Jun-feng Zhu;Jan Vanderborght;Harry Vereecken;Tian-Chyi J. Yeh
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 274-286
310 views DOI Abstract
2014
a time fractional model to represent rainfall process
;Jacques Golder;Maminirina Joelson;Marie-Christine Neel;Liliana Di Pietro
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 32-40
291 views DOI Abstract
2013
modeling and analysis of effects of precipitation and vegetation coverage on runoff and sediment yield in jinsha river basin
;Jun Du;Chang-xing Shi;Chen-di Zhang
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 44-58
291 views DOI Abstract
2015
modified sewage sludge as temporary landfill cover material
;Jun He;Feng Li;Yong Li;Xi-lin Cui
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 257-262
264 views DOI Abstract
2013
characteristics of phosphorus adsorption by sediment mineral matrices with different particle sizes
;Yang Xiao;Xiao-lian Zhu;Hao-ke Cheng;Kai-jie Li;Qi Lu;Dong-fang Liang
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 262-271
250 views DOI Abstract
2016
3d cfd validation of invert trap efficiency for sewer solid management using vof model
;Mohammad Mohsin;Deo Raj Kaushal
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 106-114
248 views DOI Abstract
1994
Clinical anatomy for emergency medicine. By Richard S. Snell, MD, PhD, and Mark S. Smith, MD. St. Louis, Mosby-Yearbook, 1993, 862 pp, $125.00
Walls, R.
Vol. 12 , pp. 274
247 views DOI
2019
Writing the Curriculum Vitae and Personal Statement.
Woo, Randy;Krawczyk Oman, Jennifer A;Byrn, Laurie;Wakim, Nicole M;Dyne, Pamela L;Cheaito, Mohamad Ali;Epter, Michael;Kazzi, Amin;
245 views DOI Abstract
2017
application of froude dynamic similitude in anaerobic baffled reactors to prediction of hydrodynamic characteristics of a prototype reactor using a model reactor
;Mehdi Hassanvand Jamadi;Abolghasem Alighardashi
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 53-58
244 views DOI Abstract
View All 50 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
50
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

50.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.