Indexed in Journament

annali dell'istituto superiore di sanita

ISSN 2384-8553· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
50.2 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #63 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
15 Articles
Scores higher than 99.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name ann ist super sanita
Abbreviated Name annali dell'istituto superiore di sanità
ISSN 2384-8553

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 60.0
Diversity 55.6
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 13.6
Content Distribution 68.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for annali dell'istituto superiore di sanita
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 60.0 5.8
Diversity 55.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 13.6 5.8
Content Distribution 68.9 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

The way to move beyond the numbers: the lesson learnt from the Italian Obstetric Surveillance System.
Vol. 55 , No. 4 , pp. 363-370
453 views DOI Abstract
1986
[Role of the mesenteric lymph nodes and spleen in infestation by Hymenolepis nana in the mouse]
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. -
433 views Abstract
2020
on the spin‐up period in wrf simulations over europe: trade‐offs between length and seasonality
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. n/a-n/a
432 views DOI Abstract
2014
Communication with the public in the health-care system: a descriptive study of the use of social media in Local Health Authorities and public hospitals in Italy
Vol. 50 , No. 2 , pp. 163-170
415 views Abstract
Are touch screen technologies more effective than traditional educational methods in children with autism spectrum disorders? A pilot study.
Vol. 55 , No. 2 , pp. 151-160
409 views DOI Abstract
Integrated care for healthcare sustainability for patients living with rare diseases.
Vol. 55 , No. 3 , pp. 276-282
399 views DOI Abstract
2011
Information gathering for CLP classification
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 132-139
391 views Abstract
Integrated care for healthcare sustainability for patients living with rare diseases.
Vol. 55 , No. 3 , pp. 276-282
387 views DOI Abstract
2009
impact of modified richards equation on global soil moisture simulation in the community land model (clm3.5)
Vol. 1 , pp. Art. #5-22 pp.
360 views DOI Abstract
2009
evaluating the influence of antecedent soil moisture on variability of the north american monsoon precipitation in the coupled mm5/vic modeling system
Vol. 1 , pp. Art. #13-22 pp.
343 views DOI Abstract
2025
Monitoring of antibiotic residues in muscles, milk and eggs of food-producing animals in Umbria and Marche regions (Central Italy) during the period time 2012-2021.
Vol. 61 , pp. 50-60
55 views DOI Abstract
2020
on the spin‐up period in wrf simulations over europe: trade‐offs between length and seasonality
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. n/a-n/a
432 views DOI Abstract
2014
Communication with the public in the health-care system: a descriptive study of the use of social media in Local Health Authorities and public hospitals in Italy
Vol. 50 , No. 2 , pp. 163-170
415 views Abstract
2012
technical note: large-eddy simulation of cloudy boundary layer with the advanced research wrf model
Vol. 4 , No. 9 , pp. M09003-16
111 views Abstract
2011
Information gathering for CLP classification
Vol. 47 , No. 2 , pp. 132-139
391 views Abstract
2009
impact of modified richards equation on global soil moisture simulation in the community land model (clm3.5)
Vol. 1 , pp. Art. #5-22 pp.
360 views DOI Abstract
2009
subtropical low cloud response to a warmer climate in an superparameterized climate model. part ii: column modeling with a cloud resolving model
Vol. 1 , pp. Art. #8-14 pp.
91 views DOI Abstract
2009
evaluating the influence of antecedent soil moisture on variability of the north american monsoon precipitation in the coupled mm5/vic modeling system
Vol. 1 , pp. Art. #13-22 pp.
343 views DOI Abstract
2009
subtropical low cloud response to a warmer climate in an superparameterized climate model: part i. regime sorting and physical mechanisms
Vol. 1 , pp. Art. #7-11 pp.
287 views DOI Abstract
1986
[Role of the mesenteric lymph nodes and spleen in infestation by Hymenolepis nana in the mouse]
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. -
433 views Abstract
Journament Score
50.2/100 · Average
Ranked #63 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

50.2/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

13.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

68.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.