impact assessment and project appraisal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2495 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

impact assessment and project appraisal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim soc
Short Name impact assessment and project appraisal
Abbreviated Name impact assessment and project appraisal
ISSN 1461-5517
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tiap20/current
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2011
the relationship between organizational culture and job satisfaction and job burnout among the employees in tabriz university
;P. Zarei;S. Zamini;D. Hosseini Nasab;S. Zamini
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 30-40
600 views Abstract
2006
assessment of noise pollution and its effects on stone cut industryworkers of malayerdistrict
;SG Atari;M Ziad;R Golmohammadi
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 23-27
289 views Abstract
2019
Public understanding of risk in health impact assessment: a psychosocial approach
Baldwin, C.
Vol. 37 , pp. 382-396
286 views DOI
2006
epidemiologicalassessment of silicosis in stone cutting workers
;M. Khaled Rezaei;I. Mohebbi
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 10-
276 views Abstract
2009
the survey of relation between musculoskeletal disorders and anthropometric indices in the bus drivers in isfahan
;E. Habibi;N. Sadeghi
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 6-14
251 views Abstract
2010
determination of hazard distance of chemical release in a petrochemical industry by chemical exposure index (cei)
;A Parsarad;M. Jahangiri
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 55-62
238 views Abstract
2020
A multicriteria proposal for large-scale solar photovoltaic impact assessment
Pimentel, Da Silva G.
Vol. 38 , pp. 3-15
204 views DOI
2008
occupationalhearing nimpairmentoise-induced hearing loss and hypertension associated with long term occupational exposure to noise
;A. Rajaei-Fard;M. Madahi;M. Neghab
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 36-42
180 views Abstract
2005
analysis of lung tissue particles among silicosis cases
;B Case;P Looserwanich;A Dufresne;A Nayebzadeh
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 17-23
167 views Abstract
2007
a review of nanotechnology and nanotoxicology (editorial)
;A.A. Farshad;SH. Bakand
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 1-3
155 views
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.