Indexed in Journament

brachytherapy

ISSN 1873-1449· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,736 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
31 Articles
Scores higher than 8.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name brachytherapy
Abbreviated Name brachytherapy
ISSN 1873-1449
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/brachytherapy

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 19.5
Community Impact 7.1
Content Distribution 67.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for brachytherapy
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 19.5 27.4
Community Impact 7.1 7.8
Content Distribution 67.3 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (31)

2019
Recurrence rates for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with IOERT at a community hospital per the ASTRO consensus statement for APBI.
430 views DOI Abstract
Cosmetic assessment in brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy) for breast cancer: A multidisciplinary review.
Vol. 18 , No. 5 , pp. 635-644
404 views DOI Abstract
2016
cluster-randomized controlled study of sms text messages for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of hiv in rural kenya
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
367 views DOI Abstract
Modeling of the direction modulated brachytherapy tandem applicator using the Oncentra Brachy advanced collapsed cone engine.
Vol. 17 , No. 6 , pp. 1030-1036
360 views DOI Abstract
2012
differences in the nonuse of any contraception and use of specific contraceptive methods in hiv positive and hiv negative rwandan women
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
329 views DOI Abstract
2012
nevirapine-based antiretroviral therapy impacts artesunate and dihydroartemisinin disposition in hiv-infected nigerian adults
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
325 views DOI Abstract
2019
An evaluation of gender diversity in the American Brachytherapy Society.
320 views DOI Abstract
2016
hiv-associated oral mucosal melanin hyperpigmentation: a clinical study in a south african population sample
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
The association of intraprostatic calcifications and dosimetry parameters with biochemical control after permanent prostate implant.
307 views DOI Abstract
2020
prediction of cd4 t-lymphocyte count using who clinical staging among art-naïve hiv-infected adolescents and adults in northern ethiopia: a retrospective study
Vol. 2020 , pp. -
198 views DOI Abstract
2019
An evaluation of gender diversity in the American Brachytherapy Society.
320 views DOI Abstract
2019
The association of intraprostatic calcifications and dosimetry parameters with biochemical control after permanent prostate implant.
307 views DOI Abstract
2019
Recurrence rates for patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with IOERT at a community hospital per the ASTRO consensus statement for APBI.
430 views DOI Abstract
2017
hiv epidemic in tanzania: the possible role of the key populations
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
238 views DOI Abstract
2016
hiv-associated oral mucosal melanin hyperpigmentation: a clinical study in a south african population sample
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
316 views DOI Abstract
2016
use of cognitive interviews to adapt promis measurement items for spanish speakers living with hiv
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
107 views DOI Abstract
2016
cluster-randomized controlled study of sms text messages for prevention of mother-to-child transmission of hiv in rural kenya
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
367 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
25.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,736 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

25.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

19.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.