health care management science | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1593 / 33,955
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

health care management science

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name health care manag sci
Abbreviated Name health care management science
ISSN 1386-9620
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/10729
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (25 total)

2014
assessment of knowledge of cancer and lymphoedema among breast cancer survivors
;Aleksandra Krzywonos;Katarzyna Ochałek;Anna Krzywonos-Zawadzka;Kamil Pitala
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 273-279
436 views DOI Abstract
2016
relation between visceral fat and carotid intimal media thickness in mexican postmenopausal women: a preliminary report
;Sebastián Carranza-Lira;Yessica Mireya Moreno Azpilcueta;Sergio Rosales Ortiz
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 81-84
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient classification based on volume and case-mix in the emergency department and their association with performance.
Zaerpour, Farzad;Bischak, Diane P;Menezes, Mozart B C;McRae, Andrew;Lang, Eddy S;
329 views DOI Abstract
2015
overweight, obesity and female sexuality in perimenopause: a preliminary report
;Grażyna Jarząbek-Bielecka;Maciej Wilczak;Anna Potasińska-Sobkowska;Magdalena Pisarska-Krawczyk;Małgorzata Mizgier;Karolina Andrzejak;Witold Kędzia;Stefan Sajdak
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 97-104
322 views DOI Abstract
2020
Are patients more adherent to newer drugs?
Blankart, Katharina E;Lichtenberg, Frank R;
309 views DOI Abstract
2019
Letter to editor: about criticisms regarding manuscript entitled “assessment of the impact of public hospital associations (PHAs) on the efficiency of hospitals under the Ministry of Health in Turkey with data envelopment analysis”
Şahin, B.
Vol. 22 , pp. 448-450
309 views DOI
2019
Individuals' adoption of smart technologies for preventive health care: a structural equation modeling approach.
Bettiga, Debora;Lamberti, Lucio;Lettieri, Emanuele;
288 views DOI Abstract
2017
Strategic level proton therapy patient admission planning: a Markov decision process modeling approach
Gedik R;Zhang S;Rainwater C;;
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. -
259 views Abstract
2010
obrazowanie kompleksu łechtaczkowego w diagnostyce seksuologicznej
;Anita Błażejewska;Zbigniew Lew-Starowicz;Monika Łukasiewicz
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 87-90
258 views Abstract
2019
A novel approach for breast cancer prediction using optimized ANN classifier based on big data environment.
Supriya, M;Deepa, A J;
250 views DOI Abstract
View All 25 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.