Indexed in Journament

diabetes & metabolic syndrome

ISSN 1878-0334· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #8,201 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
19 Articles
Scores higher than 72% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name diabetes metab syndr
Abbreviated Name diabetes metab syndr
ISSN 1878-0334
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/diabetes-and-metabolic-syndrome-clinical-research-and-reviews

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 67.5
Community Impact 14.3
Content Distribution 76.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for diabetes & metabolic syndrome
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 67.5 27.4
Community Impact 14.3 7.8
Content Distribution 76.8 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (19)

2019
Chronic medical conditions based obesity phenotypes: A two-step cluster analysis of a representative sample of obese American adults.
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 2897-2905
503 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of vitamin D supplementation on circulatory YKL-40 and MCP-1 biomarkers associated with vascular diabetic complications: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 2873-2877
463 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comorbidities in COVID-19: Outcomes in hypertensive cohort and controversies with renin angiotensin system blockers.
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 283-287
418 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prevalence of urinary incontinence in males with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 2953-2956
408 views DOI Abstract
Body mass index growth trajectories from birth through 24 months in Iranian infants of mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 408-412
391 views DOI Abstract
2020
Management of asymptomatic hyperuricemia: Integrated Diabetes & Endocrine Academy (IDEA) consensus statement.
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 93-100
388 views DOI Abstract
Assessment of autonomic functions and its association with telomerase level, oxidative stress and inflammation in complete glycemic spectrum- an exploratory study.
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 1193-1199
381 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID-19 pandemic and challenges for socio-economic issues, healthcare and National Health Programs in India.
Vol. 14 , No. 5 , pp. 757-759
379 views DOI Abstract
Self-care behaviors in patients with type 2 diabetes: Education intervention base on social cognitive theory.
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 2049-2056
363 views DOI Abstract
2020
Managing common endocrine disorders amid COVID-19 pandemic.
Vol. 14 , No. 5 , pp. 767-771
266 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID-19 pandemic and challenges for socio-economic issues, healthcare and National Health Programs in India.
Vol. 14 , No. 5 , pp. 757-759
379 views DOI Abstract
2020
Telemedicine for diabetes care in India during COVID19 pandemic and national lockdown period: Guidelines for physicians.
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 273-276
318 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID-19: From bench to bed side.
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 277-281
254 views DOI Abstract
2020
Comorbidities in COVID-19: Outcomes in hypertensive cohort and controversies with renin angiotensin system blockers.
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 283-287
418 views DOI Abstract
2020
Management of asymptomatic hyperuricemia: Integrated Diabetes & Endocrine Academy (IDEA) consensus statement.
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 93-100
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
Impact of flash glucose monitoring on glycaemic control and quality of life in patients with type 1 diabetes: A 18-month follow-up in real life.
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 65-69
330 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prevalence of urinary incontinence in males with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Vol. 13 , No. 5 , pp. 2953-2956
408 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #8,201 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

67.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

14.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

76.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.