klinicheskaia meditsina | Journament

Journal Ranking

#855 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

klinicheskaia meditsina

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name klin med (mosk)
Abbreviated Name klin med (mosk)
ISSN 0023-2149
Aim and Scope
URL http://elibrary.ru/title_about.asp?id=7850
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (9 total)

2018
glucagon-like peptide-1 exerts anti-inflammatory effects on mouse colon smooth muscle cells through the cyclic adenosine monophosphate/nuclear factor-κb pathway in vitro
;Al-Dwairi A;Alqudah TE;Al-Shboul O;Alqudah M;Mustafa AG;Alfaqih MA
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 95-109
287 views Abstract
2003
[Level of Helicobacter pylori infection of the gastric mucosa in the optimization of a daily dose of antihelicobacter drugs].
Orziev, Z M;Nurbaev, F E;Rakhimova, G Sh;
Vol. 81 , No. 10 , pp. 34-6
239 views Abstract
2013
airway inflammatory markers in individuals with cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis
;Bergin DA;Hurley K;Mehta A;Cox S;Ryan D;O’Neill SJ;Reeves EP;McElvaney NG
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 1-11
224 views Abstract
2014
systemic sensitization with the protein allergen ovalbumin augments local sensitization in atopic dermatitis
;Yoo J;Manicone AM;McGuire JK;Wang Y;Parks WC
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 29-38
216 views Abstract
2018
chronic tonsillitis and biofilms: a brief overview of treatment modalities [corrigendum]
;Abu Bakar M;McKimm J;Haque SZ;Majumder MAA;Haque M
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 375-376
203 views Abstract
2015
effects of exendin-4, a glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist, on neutrophil count and inflammatory cytokines in a rat model of endotoxemia
;Yanay O;Bailey AL;Kernan K;Zimmerman JJ;Osborne WR
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 129-135
196 views Abstract
2008
progress and perspectives on the role of rpe cell inflammatory responses in the development of age-related macular degeneration
;Suofu Qin;Gerard A Rodrigues
Vol. 2008 , No. default , pp. 49-65
154 views Abstract
2013
effect of budesonide on fibroblast-mediated collagen gel contraction and degradation
;Fang Q;Schulte NA;Kim H;Kobayashi T;Wang X;Miller-Larsson A;Wieslander E;Toews ML;Liu X;Rennard SI
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 25-33
149 views Abstract
2014
inflammatory bowel disease: clinical aspects and treatments
;Fakhoury M;Negrulj R;Mooranian A;Al-Salami H
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 113-120
105 views Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.