eye & contact lens | Journament

Journal Ranking

#536 / 33,855
📉 Poor
Overall Score
34.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 5 days ago

eye & contact lens

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name eye contact lens
Abbreviated Name eye contact lens
ISSN 1542-233X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (65 total)

2016
the physiological state of the larvae and infestation of domestic ungulates by echinococcus granulosus (cyclophyllidea, taeniidae) in north-eastern ukraine
;A. M. Yemets;V. M. Demenko;V. V. Kabanyets
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. -
1,035 views DOI Abstract
2007
influence of the right-handed and left-hand vortex pulsed magnetic fields on bioelectric activity of ante-rior and posterior zones of hypothalamus under stress simulation
;G. O. Zadorozhna;V. P. Lyashenko
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 93-98
251 views DOI Abstract
2015
physiological and biochemical reactions of hordeum vulgare seedlings to the action of silver nanoparticles
;N. O. Khromykh;L. V. Shupranova;Y. V. Lykholat;V. S. Bil’chuk;V. S. Fedenko;L. V. Boguslavs’ka;O. I. Borysova
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. -
239 views DOI Abstract
2019
Commonly Held Beliefs About Myopia That Lack a Robust Evidence Base.
Brennan, Noel A;Cheng, Xu;
Vol. 45 , No. 4 , pp. 215-225
232 views DOI Abstract
2016
ecogeographical determinants of the ecological niche of the common milkweed (asclepias syriaca) on the basis of indices of remote sensing of land images
;O. M. Kunah;O. S. Papka
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 78-86
225 views DOI Abstract
2016
effect of zinc salt solutions on the development of chlorophyll and formation of seeds of maize hybrids
;M. D. Tafij;V. І. Nikolaichuk;V. J. Belchhazi
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. -
225 views DOI Abstract
2012
geochemistry of vanadium in soils of forest ecosystems of the prysamar’ja dniprovske region
;N. N. Tsvetkova;A. A. Dubina;Y. O. Tagunova
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 95-100
213 views DOI Abstract
2016
influence of physical and emotional activity on the metabolic profile of blood serum of race horses
;T. I. Bayeva;G. F. Zhegunov
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. -
211 views DOI Abstract
2012
trophic relations of pterostichus melanarius (coleoptera, carabidae) with dominant species of invertebrates in forest ecosystems of steppe dnieper region
;О. V. Korolev;V. V. Brygadyrenko
Vol. 20 , No. 1 , pp. 48-54
204 views DOI Abstract
2016
the lipid peroxidation intensity of fungi strains from the orders agaricales and polyporales
;O. V. Fedotov
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. -
200 views DOI Abstract
View All 65 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.