Indexed in Journament

eye & contact lens

ISSN 1542-233X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,620 of 33,995 indexed journals
65 Articles
Accessibility 35
Engagement 31
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name eye contact lens
Abbreviated Name eye contact lens
ISSN 1542-233X
URL https://journals.lww.com/claojournal/pages/default.aspx

Publications Per Year

Articles (65)

2015
physiological and biochemical reactions of hordeum vulgare seedlings to the action of silver nanoparticles
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. -
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
Commonly Held Beliefs About Myopia That Lack a Robust Evidence Base.
Vol. 45 , No. 4 , pp. 215-225
279 views DOI Abstract
2016
effect of zinc salt solutions on the development of chlorophyll and formation of seeds of maize hybrids
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. -
276 views DOI Abstract
2016
influence of physical and emotional activity on the metabolic profile of blood serum of race horses
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. -
269 views DOI Abstract
2012
geochemistry of vanadium in soils of forest ecosystems of the prysamar’ja dniprovske region
Vol. 20 , No. 2 , pp. 95-100
263 views DOI Abstract
2015
the processes of lipid peroxidation in the cells of chlorobium limicola imv k-8 under the influence of copper (ii) sulphate
Vol. 24 , No. 1 , pp. 72-77
252 views DOI Abstract
2019
Commonly Held Beliefs About Myopia That Lack a Robust Evidence Base.
Vol. 45 , No. 4 , pp. 215-225
279 views DOI Abstract
2016
effect of zinc salt solutions on the development of chlorophyll and formation of seeds of maize hybrids
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. -
276 views DOI Abstract
2016
synopsis of the genus anopteris (pteridophyta, pteridaceae)
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. -
133 views DOI Abstract
2016
influence of physical and emotional activity on the metabolic profile of blood serum of race horses
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. -
269 views DOI Abstract
2016
method of ecological assessment of oil-contaminated soils
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. -
247 views DOI Abstract
2016
2015
spreading and accumulation of heavy metals in soils of railway-side areas
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. -
83 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,620 of 33,995

Overall Quality Score

36.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.