Indexed in Journament

International journal for equity in health

ISSN 1475-9276· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
46.6 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #267 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
41 Articles
Scores higher than 99% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Int J Equity Health
Abbreviated Name international journal for equity in health
ISSN 1475-9276
URL https://equityhealthj.biomedcentral.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for International journal for equity in health
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 20.0 5.8
Diversity 94.4 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 7.9 5.8
Content Distribution 70.3 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (41)

2019
Mental health problems and socioeconomic disadvantage: a controlled household study in rural Ethiopia
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
775 views Abstract
2019
Challenges to hypertension and diabetes management in rural Uganda: a qualitative study with patients, village health team members, and health care professionals.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 38
521 views DOI Abstract
2019
Social and cultural construction processes involved in HPV vaccine hesitancy among Chinese women: a qualitative study.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 147
457 views DOI Abstract
2017
Socioeconomic inequalities in under-five mortality in rural Bangladesh: evidence from seven national surveys spreading over 20 years
Vol. 16 , No. 1 , pp. 1-7
443 views Abstract
2019
Affordable and equitable access to subsidised outpatient medicines? Analysis of co-payments under the Additional Drug Package in Kyrgyzstan.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 89
437 views DOI Abstract
2019
Social inequalities in the burden of care: a dyadic analysis in the caregiving partners of persons with a physical disability.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 3
426 views DOI Abstract
2020
Socioeconomic differences in caesarean section - are they explained by medical need? An analysis of patient record data of a large Kenyan hospital.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 117
409 views DOI Abstract
2023
Improvement studies for equitable and evidence-based innovation: an overview of the 'IM-SEEN' model.
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 116
131 views DOI Abstract
2020
Socioeconomic differences in caesarean section - are they explained by medical need? An analysis of patient record data of a large Kenyan hospital.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 117
409 views DOI Abstract
2020
Prevalence and associated factors of self-treatment behaviour among different elder subgroups in rural China: a cross-sectional study.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 32
371 views DOI Abstract
2020
"To mean something to someone": sport-for-development as a lever for social inclusion.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 11
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Social and emotional developmental vulnerability at age five in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal children in New South Wales: a population data linkage study
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
329 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ethics, health policy-making and the economic crisis: a qualitative interview study with European policy-makers.
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 144
303 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
46.6/100 · Below Average
Ranked #267 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

46.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

94.4/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.