the lancet public health | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4859 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

the lancet public health

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name the lancet public health
Abbreviated Name the lancet public health
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2019
20-year trends in cause-specific heart failure outcomes by sex, socioeconomic status, and place of diagnosis: a population-based study
Lawson, C.
Vol. 4 , pp. e406-e420
346 views DOI
2019
Trends in life expectancy and age-specific mortality in England and Wales, 1970–2016, in comparison with a set of 22 high-income countries: an analysis of vital statistics data
ProfPhD, David A Leon,;PhD, Dmitry A Jdanov,;PhD, Vladimir M Shkolnikov,;
Vol. 4 , No. 11 , pp. e575-e582
296 views Abstract
2017
hubungan kompetensi kepribadian mahasiswa guru dengan motivasi berprestasi siswa [relationship between student teacher’s personality competence and student’s motivation of achievement]
;Budi Wibawanta;Novemelia Purba
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 53-68
286 views DOI Abstract
2017
hubungan motivasi belajar siswa dengan persepsi siswa dalam berprestasi [the relationship between students' motivation and students' perceptions of achievement]
;Rosyeline Nesac Djuarsa;Imanuel Adhitya Wulanata;Dylmoon Hidayat
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 21-34
265 views DOI Abstract
2017
student teacher's language ability and its effects toward teaching and learning process
;Asihlya Sandu
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 151-164
235 views DOI Abstract
2019
Addressing weight stigma: a timely call
Flint, S.
Vol. 4 , pp. e322
217 views DOI
2019
Addressing weight stigma
The, Lancet Public Health
Vol. 4 , pp. e168
209 views DOI
2018
peran dan karya roh kudus serta implikasinya terhadap pengembangan pribadi dan kualitas pengajaran guru kristen [roles and work of the holy spirit and the implications for the personal development and teaching quality of christian teachers]
;Imanuel Adhitya Wulanata
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 19-30
207 views DOI Abstract
2020
Diagnosis of physical and mental health conditions in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study
Williams, R.
Vol. 5 , pp. e543-e550
206 views DOI
2017
code switching in bipa classes: teachers' and students’ attitudes
;Hanna Suteja;Christina Purwanti
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 43-52
169 views DOI Abstract
View All 13 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.