Indexed in Journament

Journal of psychosomatic research

ISSN 1879-1360· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,239 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
31 Articles
Scores higher than 88.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Psychosom Res
Abbreviated Name journal of psychosomatic research
ISSN 1879-1360
URL http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/525474/description#description

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of psychosomatic research
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 66.7 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 6.4 5.8
Content Distribution 70.5 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (31)

2017
Body awareness training in the treatment of wearing-off related anxiety in patients with Parkinson's disease: Results from a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Vol. 103 , pp. 1-8
455 views DOI Abstract
2019
Changes in negative affect and changes in heart rate variability among low-income latinos with type 2 diabetes in a randomized, controlled stress management trial.
Vol. 124 , pp. 109774
395 views DOI Abstract
2020
Same same but different? DSM-5 versus ICD-11 PTSD among traumatized refugees in Germany.
Vol. 134 , pp. 110129
385 views DOI Abstract
2020
Exploring emotional dysregulation characteristics and comorbid psychiatric disorders in type 1 diabetic children with disordered eating behavior risk.
Vol. 131 , pp. 109960
369 views DOI Abstract
2019
Women in refuge: Syrian women voicing health sequelae due to war traumatic experiences and displacement challenges.
Vol. 129 , pp. 109909
367 views DOI Abstract
2020
Protocol for a partially nested randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the scleroderma patient-centered intervention network COVID-19 home-isolation activities together (SPIN-CHAT) program to reduce anxiety among at-risk scleroderma patients.
Vol. 135 , pp. 110132
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Emotion regulation in patients with heart failure: Its relationship with depressive symptoms and rehospitalization.
Vol. 125 , pp. 109811
343 views DOI Abstract
2020
Multiple physical symptoms and individual characteristics - A cross-sectional study of the general population.
Vol. 131 , pp. 109941
339 views DOI Abstract
2022
Flourishing mental health and lifestyle behaviours in adults with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: results from the Diabetes MILES - The Netherlands Study.
Vol. 160 , pp. 110950
162 views DOI Abstract
2020
Protocol for a partially nested randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the scleroderma patient-centered intervention network COVID-19 home-isolation activities together (SPIN-CHAT) program to reduce anxiety among at-risk scleroderma patients.
Vol. 135 , pp. 110132
357 views DOI Abstract
2020
The role of physical activity in the association between multimorbidity and depressive symptoms: Data from 60,202 adults from the Brazilian National Health Survey.
Vol. 134 , pp. 110122
318 views DOI Abstract
2020
Same same but different? DSM-5 versus ICD-11 PTSD among traumatized refugees in Germany.
Vol. 134 , pp. 110129
385 views DOI Abstract
2020
Exploring emotional dysregulation characteristics and comorbid psychiatric disorders in type 1 diabetic children with disordered eating behavior risk.
Vol. 131 , pp. 109960
369 views DOI Abstract
2020
Multiple physical symptoms and individual characteristics - A cross-sectional study of the general population.
Vol. 131 , pp. 109941
339 views DOI Abstract
2020
2019
Women in refuge: Syrian women voicing health sequelae due to war traumatic experiences and displacement challenges.
Vol. 129 , pp. 109909
367 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
39.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,239 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

66.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

70.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.