psicologia: reflexao e critica | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7046 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

psicologia: reflexao e critica

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name psicologia: reflexao e critica
Abbreviated Name psicologia: reflexao e critica
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2005
Emotional intelligence and psychological well-being among middle-aged and old men and women / Bem-estar psicológico e inteligência emocional entre homens e mulheres na meia-idade e na velhice
Queroz, Nelma Caires;Neri, Anita Liberalesso;
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 292-299
360 views Abstract
2019
Empirically supported interventions in psychology: contributions of Research Domain Criteria
Pasion, R.
Vol. 32 , pp. 0-0
337 views DOI
2019
The development of episodic foresight in preschoolers: the role of socioeconomic status, parental future orientation, and family context
Vásquez-Echeverría, A.
Vol. 32 , pp. 0-0
322 views DOI
2019
Multicomponent positive psychology intervention for health promotion of Brazilian retirees: a quasi-experimental study
Durgante, H.
Vol. 32 , pp. 0-0
320 views DOI
2009
Relação entre consciência morfológica e leitura contextual medida pelo teste de Cloze The relationship between morphological awareness and contextual reading measured by the Cloze test
Mota, Márcia Maria Peruzzi Elia da;Lisboa, Rafaela;Dias, Jaqueline;Gontijo, Rhaisa;Paiva, Nádia;Mansur-Lisboa, Stella;Silva, Danielle Andrade;Santos, Acácia Aparecida Angeli dos;
Vol. 22 , No. 2 , pp. 223-229
320 views Abstract
2019
The relationship of internalizing problems with emotional intelligence and social skills in secondary education students: gender differences
Salavera, C.
Vol. 32 , pp. 0-0
307 views DOI
2005
Estratégias de psicodiagnóstico interventivo e apoio em crises adaptativas por meio do jogo de areia e da EDAO Interventive psychodiagnostic strategies and support on adjustment crisis using sandplay and EDAO
Giovanetti, Rodrigo Manoel;Sant'Anna, Paulo Afrânio;
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 402-407
304 views Abstract
2019
The Academic Self-Regulation Questionnaire: a study with Portuguese elementary school children
Gomes, M.
Vol. 32 , pp. 0-0
303 views DOI
2018
18REST: A short RIASEC-interest measure for large-scale educational and vocational assessment
Ambiel, R.
Vol. 31 , pp. 0-0
291 views
2005
Interventive psychodiagnostic strategies and support on adjustment crisis using sandplay and EDAO / Estratégias de psicodiagnóstico interventivo e apoio em crises adaptativas por meio do jogo de areia e da EDAO
Giovanetti, Rodrigo Manoel;Sant'Anna, Paulo Afrânio;
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 402-407
247 views Abstract
View All 17 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.