acta oncologica (stockholm, sweden) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#306 / 33,853
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

acta oncologica (stockholm, sweden)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name acta oncol
Abbreviated Name acta oncol
ISSN 1651-226X
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (44 total)

2019
LINAC based stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: guidance for clinical implementation.
Hartgerink, Dianne;Swinnen, Ans;Roberge, David;Nichol, Alan;Zygmanski, Piotr;Yin, Fang-Fang;Deblois, François;Hurkmans, Coen;Ong, Chin Loon;Bruynzeel, Anna;Aizer, Ayal;Fiveash, John;Kirckpatrick, John;Guckenberger, Matthias;Andratschke, Nicolaus;de Ruysscher, Dirk;Popple, Richard;Zindler, Jaap;
, pp. 1-8
305 views DOI Abstract
2020
experimental study on the deformation and strength characteristics of saturated clay under cyclic loading
;Jian Zhang;Yangguang Sun;Jiuting Cao
Vol. 2020 , pp. -
290 views DOI Abstract
2016
effects of asphalt mix design properties on pavement performance: a mechanistic approach
;Ahmad M. Abu Abdo;S. J. Jung
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
270 views DOI Abstract
2014
drying shrinkage behaviour of fibre reinforced concrete incorporating polyvinyl alcohol fibres and fly ash
;Amin Noushini;Kirk Vessalas;Garo Arabian;Bijan Samali
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
263 views DOI Abstract
2016
Parents of children diagnosed with cancer: work situation and sick leave, a five-year post end-of-treatment or a child's death follow-up study.
Wikman, Anna;Hovén, Emma;Cernvall, Martin;Ljungman, Gustaf;Ljungman, Lisa;von Essen, Louise;
Vol. 55 , No. 9-10 , pp. 1152-1157
256 views DOI Abstract
2018
researches on damage evolution and acoustic emission characteristics of rocks
;Yong Chen;Yugui Yang;Feng Gao;Xiangxiang Zhang
Vol. 2018 , pp. -
243 views DOI Abstract
2017
Is there a different dose-effect relation between the primary tumor and involved lymph nodes in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer? A hypothesis-generating study.
Van den Bosch, Lisa;Defraene, Gilles;Peeters, Stéphanie;Dooms, Christophe;De Wever, Walter;Deroose, Christophe;De Ruysscher, Dirk;
Vol. 56 , No. 4 , pp. 541-547
242 views DOI Abstract
2010
laboratory characterization and influence of mineralogy and grading on the performance of treated and untreated granular materials used as surface pavements in unpaved road
;L. Beaulieu;P. Pierre;J.-P. Bilodeau
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
228 views DOI Abstract
2016
elaboration of the method for safety assessment of subsea pipeline with longitudinal buckling
;Liudmila Muravyeva;Nikolai Vatin
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
225 views DOI Abstract
1996
Auger-electron spectra of radionuclides for therapy and diagnostics.
Stepanek, J;Larsson, B;Weinreich, R;
Vol. 35 , No. 7 , pp. 863-8
224 views Abstract
View All 44 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.