technology and culture | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1423 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

technology and culture

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci ahci soc
Short Name technol cult
Abbreviated Name technol cult
ISSN 1097-3729
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/technology-and-culture
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2015
implementasi program-program pembelajaran tk unggulan di surakarta
;Junita Dwi Wardhani;Aryati Prasetyarini;Wili Astuti
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 43-55
258 views Abstract
Sight-Seeing in School: Visual Technology, Virtual Experience, and World Citizenship in American Education, 1900-1930.
Good, Katie Day;
Vol. 60 , No. 1 , pp. 98-131
252 views DOI Abstract
2019
Seawalls at Work: Envirotech and Labor on the North Sea Coast before 1800.
Soens, Tim;De Block, Greet;Jongepier, Iason;
Vol. 60 , No. 3 , pp. 688-725
251 views DOI Abstract
2011
Making the invisible engineer visible: Dupont and the recognition of nuclear expertise
Johnston, S.
Vol. 52 , pp. 548-573
242 views DOI
2019
Photography and Forgery in Early Capitalist Siam.
Lim, Samson;
Vol. 60 , No. 3 , pp. 795-815
238 views DOI Abstract
2015
pengaruh model pembelajaran search, solve, create, and share dan predict observe explain terhadap hasil belajar biologi siswa kelas viii smpn 1 gondangrejo karanganyar tahun ajaran 2013/2014
;Djumadi Djumadi;Erfan Budi Santoso
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 11-20
220 views Abstract
2015
strategi penerimaan peserta didik baru di sd muhammadiyah program khusus boyolali
;Destyana Ratih Pramachintya;Budi Sutrisno
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 55-61
218 views Abstract
2015
pemberdayaan guru sekolah dasar negeri arjosari kabupaten pacitan
;Imam Kurdi
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. -
212 views Abstract
2015
peningkatan dalam menyusun rencana pelaksanaan melalui supervisi klinis pada kepala sd daerah binaan ii uptd pendidikan kecamatan kalikotes kabupaten klaten semester gasal tahun pelajaran 2014/2015
;Sri Sumarsih
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. -
211 views Abstract
2015
pembinaan siswa berbakat dan berprestasi di sma negeri 1 semarang
;Esti Gusti Arini
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. -
206 views Abstract
View All 17 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.