journal of health care for the poor and underserved | Journament

Journal Ranking

#995 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

journal of health care for the poor and underserved

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name j health care poor underserved
Abbreviated Name j health care poor underserved
ISSN 1548-6869
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.press.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_health_care_for_the_poor_and_underserved
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

2019
Socioeconomic Risk Factors for <i>Plasmodium falciparum</i> Infection in Primary School Children in Three Districts of the Volta Region Of Ghana.
Orish, Verner N;Agbemafle, Isaac;Obum, Edem K;Onyeabor, Onyekachi S;Sanyaolu, Adekunle O;Okorie, Chuku;Adzaku, Festus K;
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 1165-1183
429 views DOI Abstract
2014
The projected effect of the Affordable Care Act on dental care for adult Medicaid enrollees.
Flynn, Priscilla;Call, Kathleen Thiede;Pintor, Jessie Kemmick;Elmi, Nafisa;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 Suppl , pp. 79-94
400 views DOI Abstract
2018
a 3d printed linear pneumatic actuator for position, force and impedance control
;Jeremy Krause;Pranav Bhounsule
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 24-
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
Food Transition and Oral Health in Two Brazilian Indigenous Peoples: A Grounded Theory Model.
Soares, Gustavo Hermes;de Almeida Carrer, Fernanda Campos;Biazevic, Maria Gabriela;Michel-Crosato, Edgard;
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 1037-1052
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Creating Culturally-Specific and Community-Specific Approaches to Linking Low Socioeconomic Smokers to Cessation Services.
Specktor, Carole;Keller, Paula A;
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 934-939
357 views DOI Abstract
2018
Exploring the Relationship between Maternal Health Literacy, Parenting Self-Efficacy, and Early Parenting Practices among Low-Income Mothers with Infants.
Lee, Ju-Young;Murry, Nicole;Ko, Jisook;Kim, Miyong T;
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. 1455-1471
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
At-Risk Stakeholder Behavior Change with Community-Based Health Events.
Parks, Mitchell H;Chen, Chau-Kuang;Haygood, Christina D;McGee, M Lisa;
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 1184-1196
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
Tobacco Smoking, Substance Use, and Mental Health Symptoms in People with HIV in an Urban HIV Clinic.
Miles, D R Bailey;Bilal, Usama;Hutton, Heidi E;Lau, Bryan;Lesko, Catherine R;Fojo, Anthony;McCaul, Mary E;Keruly, Jeanne;Moore, Richard D;Chander, Geetanjali;
Vol. 30 , No. 3 , pp. 1083-1102
309 views DOI Abstract
2016
An exploratory study examining risk communication among adolescent children, their incarcerated mothers, and their caregivers
Robillard, A.
Vol. 27 , pp. 101-119
309 views DOI
2015
self-sensing ionic polymer actuators: a review
;Karl Kruusamäe;Andres Punning;Alvo Aabloo;Kinji Asaka
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 17-38
285 views DOI Abstract
View All 26 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.