head & neck | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1937 / 33,955
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

head & neck

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name head neck
Abbreviated Name head neck
ISSN 1097-0347
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10970347
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2016
External validation of sTWEAK as a prognostic noninvasive biomarker for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Terra, Ximena;Gómez, David;García-Lorenzo, Jacinto;Flores, Joan Carles;Figuerola, Enric;Mora, Josefina;Chacón, Matilde R;Quer, Miquel;Camacho, Mercedes;León, Xavier;Avilés-Jurado, Francesc Xavier;
Vol. 38 Suppl 1 , pp. E1358-63
349 views DOI Abstract
2020
Rapid implementation of an evidence-based remote triaging system for assessment of suspected head and neck cancer referrals and patients on follow up after treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic: A model for international collaboration.
Paleri, Vinidh;Hardman, John;Tikka, Theofano;Bradley, Paula;Pracy, Paul;Fdsrcs, Cyrus Kerawala;
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Factors driving frequent attendance at emergency departments for patients with head and neck cancer.
Tan, Aidan L;Iyer, Narayanan Gopalakrishna;Putri, Natascha;Nadkarni, Nivedita;Skanthakumar, Thakshayeni;Wong, Ting Hway;Tay, Gerald Ci An;
Vol. 41 , pp. 3798-3805
335 views DOI Abstract
2013
Risk of developing sudden sensorineural hearing loss in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A population-based cohort study
Lin, Charlene;Lin, Shih-Wei;Weng, Shih-Feng;Lin, Yung-Song;
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. 203-208
294 views DOI
2018
the role of intelligence in learning english as a foreign language
;Mousa Ghonchepour;Mahdiye Pakzad Moghaddam
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 25-38
283 views Abstract
2019
Novel technique for the direct closure of the radial forearm flap donor site defect with a local bilobed flap.
Mashrah, Mubarak Ahmed;Lingjian, Yan;Handley, Thomas Peter;Pan, Chaobin;Weiliang, Chen;
Vol. 41 , No. 9 , pp. 3282-3289
279 views DOI Abstract
2013
the effect of differences in the general proficiency of iranian efl students on their metaphorical competence
;Zahra Rezaei;Aliakbar Jafarpour
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 62-71
268 views Abstract
2015
stuck in the gap: eap needs assessment of undergraduate students of computer science
;Nafiseh Hosseinpour;Mansoor Koosha
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 5-15
252 views Abstract
2018
a comparative evaluation of iranian elt phd curriculum: reappraisal of goals, admission criteria and course requirements in iran
;Leila Kordi;Mansour Koosha
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 295-321
196 views Abstract
2014
a contrastive analysis of english and persian native speakers' use of gambits
;Azizeh Chalak;Zahra Norouzi
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 61-70
160 views Abstract
View All 14 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.