Indexed in Journament

journal of pediatric orthopedics

ISSN 1539-2570· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,845 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
25 Articles
Scores higher than 39.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j pediatr orthop
Abbreviated Name j pediatr orthop
ISSN 1539-2570
URL http://www.pedorthopaedics.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of pediatric orthopedics
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 10.0 7.8
Content Distribution 77.0 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (25)

2009
Antegrade intramedullary nailing of pediatric femoral fractures using an interlocking pediatric femoral nail and a lateral trochanteric entry point
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. -
513 views Abstract
1970
The impact of the current epidemiology of pediatric musculoskeletal infection on evaluation and treatment guidelines
Vol. 28 , No. 7 , pp. -
447 views Abstract
2020
Wrist Joint Skeletal Changes in Children With Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia.
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nonoperative Treatment of Type IIA Supracondylar 3 Humerus Fractures: Comparing 2 Modalities.
Vol. 39 , No. 6 , pp. e487
404 views DOI
2019
Practice Patterns for Management of Pediatric Femur Fractures in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
373 views DOI Abstract
1970
Rotational control of various pediatric femur fractures stabilized with titanium elastic intramedullary nails
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. -
372 views Abstract
2014
infection prevention and control measures currently applied in south african audiology
Vol. 61 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e10
364 views DOI Abstract
2015
Injection-induced gluteus muscle contractures: diagnosis with the "reverse Ober test" and surgical management.
Vol. 35 , No. 2 , pp. 192-8
355 views DOI Abstract
2013
clinical signs and symptoms of tinnitus in temporomandibular joint disorders: a pilot study comparing patients and non-patients
Vol. 60 , No. 1 , pp. 16-20
353 views DOI Abstract
2020
Wrist Joint Skeletal Changes in Children With Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia.
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
Clubfoot and Tethered Cord Syndrome: Results of Treatment With the Ponseti Method.
Vol. 39 , No. 6 , pp. 318-321
277 views DOI Abstract
2019
MRI in Postreduction Evaluation of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Our Experience.
Vol. 39 , No. 9 , pp. 449-452
303 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pediatric Emergency Room Transfers: Are They Warranted?
Vol. 39 , No. 6 , pp. e430-e435
239 views DOI Abstract
2019
Variation Among Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons When Treating Medial Epicondyle Fractures.
Vol. 39 , No. 8 , pp. e592-e596
303 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nonoperative Treatment of Type IIA Supracondylar 3 Humerus Fractures: Comparing 2 Modalities.
Vol. 39 , No. 6 , pp. e487
404 views DOI
2019
Practice Patterns for Management of Pediatric Femur Fractures in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
373 views DOI Abstract
2018
skydiving: the audiological perspective
Vol. 65 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e4
269 views DOI Abstract
2017
wideband acoustic immittance for assessing middle ear functioning for preterm neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit
Vol. 64 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e11
283 views DOI Abstract
2016
primary school teachers’ opinions and attitudes towards stuttering in two south african urban education districts
Vol. 63 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e10
316 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
31.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,845 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.