journal of pediatric orthopedics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1234 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

journal of pediatric orthopedics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name j pediatr orthop
Abbreviated Name j pediatr orthop
ISSN 1539-2570
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.pedorthopaedics.com
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (25 total)

2009
Antegrade intramedullary nailing of pediatric femoral fractures using an interlocking pediatric femoral nail and a lateral trochanteric entry point
Keeler KA;Dart B;Luhmann SJ;Schoenecker PL;Ortman MR;Dobbs MB;Gordon JE;;
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. -
471 views Abstract
1970
The impact of the current epidemiology of pediatric musculoskeletal infection on evaluation and treatment guidelines
Gafur OA;Copley LA;Hollmig ST;Browne RH;Thornton LA;Crawford SE;;
Vol. 28 , No. 7 , pp. -
387 views Abstract
2019
Nonoperative Treatment of Type IIA Supracondylar 3 Humerus Fractures: Comparing 2 Modalities.
Turhal, Ozan;Karaduman, Zekeriya O;Turhan, Yalçin;
Vol. 39 , No. 6 , pp. e487
371 views DOI
2020
Wrist Joint Skeletal Changes in Children With Transfusion-Dependent Thalassemia.
Dhawan, Pawan;Kanojia, Rajesh K;Chandra, Jagdish;Kumar, Ajay;Anand, Rama;Gupta, Sumit;
365 views DOI Abstract
2019
Practice Patterns for Management of Pediatric Femur Fractures in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
Curran, Patrick F;Albright, Patrick;Ibrahim, John M;Ali, Syed H;Shearer, David W;Sabatini, Coleen S;
342 views DOI Abstract
2015
the use of non-speech oral-motor exercises among indian speech-language pathologists to treat speech disorders: an online survey
;Roha M. Thomas;Ramesh Kaipa
Vol. 62 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e12
341 views DOI Abstract
1970
Rotational control of various pediatric femur fractures stabilized with titanium elastic intramedullary nails
Gwyn DT;Olney BW;Dart BR;Czuwala PJ;;
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. -
322 views Abstract
2014
infection prevention and control measures currently applied in south african audiology
;Katerina Ehlert;Alida M. Naude
Vol. 61 , No. 1 , pp. e1-e10
319 views DOI Abstract
2013
clinical signs and symptoms of tinnitus in temporomandibular joint disorders: a pilot study comparing patients and non-patients
;Amisha Kanji;Katijah Khoza-Shangase
Vol. 60 , No. 1 , pp. 16-20
318 views DOI Abstract
2015
Injection-induced gluteus muscle contractures: diagnosis with the "reverse Ober test" and surgical management.
Scully, William F;White, Klane K;Song, Kit M;Mosca, Vincent S;
Vol. 35 , No. 2 , pp. 192-8
316 views DOI Abstract
View All 25 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.