therapeutics and clinical risk management | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1595 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

therapeutics and clinical risk management

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name ther clin risk manag
Abbreviated Name therapeutics and clinical risk management
ISSN 1176-6336
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.dovepress.com/therapeutics-and-clinical-risk-management-journal
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2016
chemical characteristics combined with bioactivity for comprehensive evaluation of tumuxiang based on hplc-dad and multivariate statistical methods
;Xia Gao;Yu-Ling Ma;Pei Zhang;Xiao-Ping Zheng;Bo-Lu Sun;Fang-Di Hu
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 36-47
588 views DOI Abstract
2015
double off-line two-dimensional liquid chromatography for separation and identification of compounds in salvia miltiorrhiza (danshen)
;Ji-xia Wang;Xiu-li Zhang;Fan Yang;Hong-li Jin;Li-ying Shi;Wei-jia Zhou;Yan-fang Liu;Xin-miao Liang
Vol. 1 , No. 3 , pp. 27-39
587 views DOI Abstract
2017
Music therapy-induced changes in salivary cortisol level are predictive of cardiovascular mortality in patients under maintenance hemodialysis
YC, Hou;YJ, Lin;KC, Lu;HS, Chiang;CC, Chang;LK, Yang;
Vol. Volume 13 , pp. 263-272
392 views Abstract
2016
Optimal medical therapy for secondary prevention after an acute coronary syndrome: 18-month follow-up results at a tertiary teaching hospital in South Korea
HJ, Byeon;YM, Yang;EJ, Choi;
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 167-175
387 views Abstract
2017
Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic operation in anus-preserving rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
Cui, Yongzhen;Li, Cheng;Xu, Zhongfa;Wang, Yingming;Sun, Yamei;Xu, Huirong;Li, Zengjun;Sun, Yanlai;
Vol. 13 , pp. 1247-1257
367 views DOI Abstract
2017
Rapid virological response of telaprevir and boceprevir in a Brazilian cohort of HCV genotype 1 patients: a multicenter longitudinal study
HHL, Borba;A, Wiens;LM, Steimbach;FS, Tonin;MLA, Pedroso;CAP, Ivantes;F, Fernandez-Llimos;R, Pontarolo;
Vol. Volume 13 , pp. 59-64
365 views Abstract
2017
Cholecalciferol improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients: a 6-month prospective interventional study
AM, Nada;DA, Shaheen;
Vol. Volume 13 , pp. 813-820
360 views Abstract
2019
The determinants of obstetricians' willingness to undertake delivery by vaginal birth after cesarean section in Taiwan.
Linn, George;Ying, Yung-Hsiang;Chang, Koyin;
Vol. 15 , pp. 991-1002
350 views DOI Abstract
2015
development of high performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry: a key engine of tcm modernization
;Zheng-Xiang Zhang;Xue Qiao;Min Ye;Man-Yu Zhang;Yue Song;Tao Bo
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 24-37
328 views DOI Abstract
2018
Sanders type 3–4 calcaneal fractures fixed with locking plate: does tri-cortical iliac bone autograft provide extra benefit for stabilization?
T, Bulut;M, Gursoy;T, Ozturk;C, Ozcan;M, Sener;
Vol. Volume 14 , pp. 1665-1670
321 views Abstract
View All 21 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
50
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.