Indexed in Journament

the quarterly journal of economics

ISSN 0033-5533· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,504 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
441 Articles
Scores higher than 6.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name the quarterly journal of economics
Abbreviated Name q j econ
ISSN 0033-5533

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Timeliness 70.0
Innovation 7.5
Community Impact 1.4
Content Distribution 13.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.1
Accessibility — 17.9
Timeliness 70.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 7.5 31.2
Community Impact 1.4 13.4
Content Distribution 13.6 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (441)

1932
Velocity Concepts: A Criticism
Charles O. Hardy;Charles O. Hardy;
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 566-
184 views DOI
1932
Velocity Concepts: A Criticism
Hardy, Charles O.;
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 566-569
149 views Abstract
1890
Studies on the Origin of the French Economists
Bauer, Stephan;
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 100-107
66 views Abstract
1890
Studies on the Origin of the French Economists
Stephan Bauer;Stephan Bauer;
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 100-
65 views DOI
2020
The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms*
David Autor, David Dorn, Lawrence F. Katz, Christina Patterson, John Van Reenen
55 views DOI Abstract
1993
A Simple Theory of Advertising as a Good or Bad
Gary S. Becker, Kevin Murphy
43 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Effect of Minimum Wages on Low-Wage Jobs*
Doruk Cengiz, Arindrajit Dubé, Attila Lindner, Ben Zipperer
41 views DOI Abstract
1992
Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation
George Loewenstein, Dražen Prelec
36 views DOI Abstract
1997
Preference Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the Health and Retirement Study
Robert Barsky, F. Thomas Juster, Miles Kimball, M. Shapiro
33 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications*
Jan De Loecker, Jan Eeckhout, Gabriel Unger
32 views DOI Abstract
2026
Capital Services in Global Value Chains
Xiang Ding
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Transmission of Reliable and Unreliable Information
Thomas Graeber, Shakked Noy, Christopher Roth
25 views DOI Abstract
2026
Mental Models of the Stock Market
Peter Andre, Philipp Schirmer, Johannes Wohlfart
12 views DOI Abstract
2026
In their Shoes: Empathy Through Information
Marianne Andries, Leonardo Bursztyn, Thomas Chaney, Milena Djourelova, Alex Imas
12 views DOI Abstract
2026
Who Pays for Unions?
Samuel Dodini, Anna Stansbury, Alexander Willén
16 views DOI Abstract
2026
What Jobs Come to Mind? Stereotypes About Fields of Study
John J. Conlon, Dev Patel
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
Praying for Rain
José‐Antonio Espín‐Sánchez, Salvador Gil-Guirado, Nicholas Ryan
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
Public Services Under Private Management
Maíra Coube, Luiz Felipe Fontes, Rudi Rocha
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Power of Proximity to Coworkers
Natalia Emanuel, Emma Harrington, Amanda Pallais
11 views DOI Abstract
2022
When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?
Alberto Abadie, Susan Athey, Guido W. Imbens, Jeffrey M. Wooldridge
18 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
25.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,504 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

25.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

7.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

1.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

70.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

13.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.