Indexed in Journament

the quarterly journal of economics

ISSN 0033-5533· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #23,572 of 29,298 scored journals (34,018 indexed)
448 Articles
Scores higher than 19.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name the quarterly journal of economics
Abbreviated Name q j econ
ISSN 0033-5533

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 80.0
Diversity 5.6
Innovation 7.5
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 37.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for the quarterly journal of economics
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.5
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 80.0 3.0
Diversity 5.6 25.9
Innovation 7.5 24.1
Community Impact 5.7 5.6
Content Distribution 37.1 89.4
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (448)

1932
Velocity Concepts: A Criticism
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 566-
224 views DOI
1932
Velocity Concepts: A Criticism
Vol. 46 , No. 3 , pp. 566-569
167 views Abstract
1976
Commodity Bundling and the Burden of Monopoly
151 views DOI Abstract
1993
Trading Volume and Serial Correlation in Stock Returns
144 views DOI Abstract
2012
Salience Theory of Choice Under Risk
129 views DOI Abstract
2012
Does Management Matter? Evidence from India *
123 views DOI Abstract
1991
Debt Maturity Structure and Liquidity Risk
114 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Effect of Minimum Wages on Low-Wage Jobs*
113 views DOI Abstract
1890
Studies on the Origin of the French Economists
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 100-107
95 views Abstract
2026
The Transmission of Reliable and Unreliable Information
91 views DOI Abstract
2026
Retrieval Failures and Consumption Smoothing: A Field Experiment on Seasonal Poverty
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Origin of Risk
28 views DOI Abstract
2026
How Does Wage Inequality Affect the Labor Movement?
22 views DOI Abstract
2026
Bringing Work Home: Flexible Work Arrangements as Gateway Jobs for Women in West Bengal
18 views DOI Abstract
2026
Attention to the Macroeconomy
31 views DOI Abstract
2026
Fairness Across the World
59 views DOI Abstract
2026
Capital Services in Global Value Chains
43 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Transmission of Reliable and Unreliable Information
91 views DOI Abstract
2026
Mental Models of the Stock Market
39 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #23,572 of 29,298 scored
(34,018 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

7.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

80.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

37.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.