aids care - psychological and socio-medical aspects of aids/hiv | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2132 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

aids care - psychological and socio-medical aspects of aids/hiv

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name aids care - psychological and socio-medical aspects of aids/hiv
Abbreviated Name aids care - psychological and socio-medical aspects of aids/hiv
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (16 total)

2019
Association between perceived HIV stigma, social support, resilience, self-esteem, and depressive symptoms among HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) in Nanjing, China
Yan, H.
Vol. 31 , pp. 1069-1076
299 views DOI
2018
“I just wish that everything is in one place”: facilitators and barriers to continuity of care among HIV-positive, postpartum women with a non-communicable disease in South Africa
Clouse, K.
Vol. 30 , pp. 5-10
299 views DOI
2020
Effect of organizational models of provider-initiated testing and counseling (PITC) in health facilities on adult HIV testing coverage in sub-Saharan Africa<sup>1</sup>
Inghels, M.
Vol. 32 , pp. 163-169
293 views DOI
2019
Adverse childhood experiences, mental health, substance use, and HIV-related outcomes among persons with HIV
Young-Wolff, K.
Vol. 31 , pp. 1241-1249
268 views DOI
2014
The impact of education and globalization on sexual and reproductive health: Retrospective evidence from eastern and southern Africa
Van, Stam M.
Vol. 26 , pp. 379-386
247 views DOI
2019
Antiretroviral therapy maintenance among HIV-positive women in Ghana: the influence of poverty
Poku, R.
, pp. 0-0
217 views DOI
2019
Stigma as experienced by children of HIV-positive parents: a narrative review
Mason, S.
Vol. 31 , pp. 1049-1060
209 views DOI
2012
fabio viola, gamification, arduino viola editore, 2011
;Federico Giordano
, pp. -
206 views Abstract
2019
The relationship between alcohol use and anxiety and retrospective attendance of primary care visits among women with human immunodeficiency virus
Ge, S.
Vol. 31 , pp. 1362-1368
197 views DOI
2016
games on games. game design as critical reflexive practice
;Giovanni Caruso;Riccardo Fassone;Gabriele Ferri;Stefano Gualeni;Mauro Salvador
, pp. -
185 views Abstract
View All 16 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.