therapeutic advances in medical oncology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#511 / 33,855
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated hace 1 día

therapeutic advances in medical oncology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexaciones
ulakbim sci
Nombre Corto ther adv med oncol
Nombre Abreviado ther adv med oncol
ISSN 1758-8340
Objetivo y Alcance
URL
Instrucciones para Autores

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2019
Phase Ib study of the combination of pexidartinib (PLX3397), a CSF-1R inhibitor, and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Wesolowski, Robert;Sharma, Neelesh;Reebel, Laura;Rodal, Mary Beth;Peck, Alexandra;West, Brian L;Marimuthu, Adhirai;Severson, Paul;Karlin, David A;Dowlati, Afshin;Le, Mai H;Coussens, Lisa M;Rugo, Hope S;
Vol. 11 , pp. 1758835919854238
349 views DOI Abstract
2017
indeks massa tubuh dengan keseimbangan statis pengguna transtibial prosthesis
;Nur Rachmat;Muhammad Syaifudin;Hanifah Hanifah
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 425-428
199 views DOI Abstract
2017
efektifitas the 6 steps reasoning diagnosis method dan intan,s clinical reasoning model (icrm) dalam penentuan standar asuhan keperawatan (sak) pada setting keperawatan maternitas
;Lisa Suarni
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 337-344
187 views DOI Abstract
2017
efek anti inflamasi ekstrak daun binahong [anredera cordifolia (ten.) steenis] topikal terhadap jumlah pmn neutrofil pada tikus jantan sprague dawley
;Gita Susanti
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 351-357
151 views DOI Abstract
2017
pemberian aromaterapi bunga mawar terhadap penurunan tekanan darah pada wanita lanjut usia di uptd panti sosial lanjut usia tresna werdha natar lampung selatan
;Ana Mariza;Annisa Umi Kalsum
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 30-35
150 views DOI Abstract
2017
faktor risiko yang mempengaruhi lama penyembuhan luka perineum pada ibu post partum
;Anur Rohmin;Baity Octariani;Morlina Jania
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 449-454
150 views DOI Abstract
2016
faktor risiko yang berpengaruh dengan kejadian kanker serviks di rsud dr. h. abdul moeloek provinsi lampung
;Ravika Chandrawati
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 282-287
147 views DOI Abstract
2017
faktor risiko kepatuhan kemoterapi pada pasien kanker payudara
;Halimatussakdiah Halimatussakdiah;Junardi Junardi
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 415-424
134 views DOI Abstract
2016
analisis sensori produk stik sukun (artocarpus altilis) dengan perlakuan pendahuluan blanching dan perendaman dalam larutan kalsium klorida
;Siti Rahayu Rachmawati
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 388-393
128 views DOI Abstract
2017
faktor perilaku cuci tangan pakai sabun (ctps) di smp
;Bambang Murwanto
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 269-276
104 views DOI Abstract
View All 14 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.