psychology of sport and exercise | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2513 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

psychology of sport and exercise

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci soc
Short Name psychology of sport and exercise
Abbreviated Name psychology of sport and exercise
ISSN 1469-0292
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/psychology-of-sport-and-exercise
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (25 total)

2019
“Arrogant, ungrateful, anti-American degenerates”: Development and initial validation of the Attitudes Toward Athlete Activism Questionnaire (ATAAQ)
Sappington, R.
Vol. 45 , pp. 0-0
286 views DOI
2019
Sports-based mental health promotion in Australia: Formative evaluation
Vella, S.
Vol. 45 , pp. 0-0
284 views DOI
2016
Using self-determination theory to promote adolescent girls' physical activity: Exploring the theoretical fidelity of the Bristol Girls Dance Project
Sebire, S.
Vol. 24 , pp. 100-110
249 views DOI
2019
Motivational processes affecting the perception of organizational and media stressors among professional football players: A longitudinal mixed methods research study
Kristiansen, E.
Vol. 43 , pp. 172-182
244 views DOI
2019
A meta-study of qualitative research on the junior-to-senior transition in sport
Drew, K.
Vol. 45 , pp. 0-0
233 views DOI
2019
Putting the ‘we’ into workout: The association of identity leadership with exercise class attendance and effort, and the mediating role of group identification and comfort
Steffens, N.
Vol. 45 , pp. 0-0
228 views DOI
2015
utilidad social de conocimientos científicos, grupos de investigación académicos y problemas sociales
;Mariana Eva Di Bello
, No. 12 , pp. -
228 views Abstract
2019
A cluster-randomized controlled trial to improve student experiences in physical education: Results of a student-centered learning intervention with high school teachers
Bechter, B.
Vol. 45 , pp. 0-0
225 views DOI
2017
¿más allá de “subcultura”? apuntes sobre el fanatismo por la animación japonesa desde los planteos de dick hebdige
;Federico Manuel Álvarez Gandolfi
, No. 17 , pp. e044-e044
199 views DOI Abstract
2015
conocimiento y dinero: las universidades de investigación y la paradoja del mercado de roger geiger (2011)
;Magalí Turkenich
, No. 12 , pp. -
183 views
View All 25 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.