Indexed in Journament

Infant mental health journal

ISSN 1097-0355· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,831 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
15 Articles
Scores higher than 80.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Infant Ment Health J
Abbreviated Name infant ment health j
ISSN 1097-0355
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10970355

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Infant mental health journal
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 40.0 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 10.7 7.8
Content Distribution 83.6 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2019
Influence of maternal reflective functioning on mothers' and children's weight: A follow-up study.
Vol. 40 , No. 6 , pp. 862-873
486 views DOI Abstract
2019
Antenatal caregiving representations and perinatal behavior in mothers with severe lifetime psychopathology.
424 views DOI Abstract
2010
A socioemotional intervention in a Latin American orphanage.
Vol. 31 , No. 5 , pp. 521-542
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Lay counselors: Thoughts on the crossing of ecological frameworks and the use of lay counselors in the scale up of early infant mental health interventions.
380 views DOI Abstract
From maid to mother: transforming facilities, staff training, and caregiver dignity in an institutional facility for young children in Nepal.
Vol. 35 , No. 2 , pp. 132-43
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Early childhood predictors of boys' antisocial and violent behavior in early adulthood.
Vol. 40 , No. 1 , pp. 67-83
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Infant mental health home visiting therapists' reflective supervision self-efficacy in community practice settings.
368 views DOI Abstract
2018
ROLE OF FIRST-YEAR MATERNAL EMPLOYMENT AND PATERNAL INVOLVEMENT IN BEHAVIORAL AND COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT OF YOUNG CHILDREN.
Vol. 39 , No. 4 , pp. 449-465
368 views DOI Abstract
2020
Validation of the AMBIANCE-brief: An observational screening instrument for disrupted caregiving.
356 views DOI Abstract
2020
A hermeneutic study of integrating psychotherapist competence in postnatal Child Health Care: Parents' perspectives.
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 108-125
323 views DOI Abstract
2020
Validation of the AMBIANCE-brief: An observational screening instrument for disrupted caregiving.
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
Antenatal caregiving representations and perinatal behavior in mothers with severe lifetime psychopathology.
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
Influence of maternal reflective functioning on mothers' and children's weight: A follow-up study.
Vol. 40 , No. 6 , pp. 862-873
486 views DOI Abstract
2019
Infant mental health home visiting therapists' reflective supervision self-efficacy in community practice settings.
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Case-contrast study about parent-infant interaction in a Brazilian sample of siblings of children with autism spectrum disorders.
Vol. 40 , No. 2 , pp. 289-301
283 views DOI Abstract
2019
Early childhood predictors of boys' antisocial and violent behavior in early adulthood.
Vol. 40 , No. 1 , pp. 67-83
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Lay counselors: Thoughts on the crossing of ecological frameworks and the use of lay counselors in the scale up of early infant mental health interventions.
380 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,831 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

40.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

83.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.