british journal of health psychology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#9394 / 33,986
📉 Poor
Overall Score
34.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
32
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

british journal of health psychology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim soc
Short Name br j health psychol
Abbreviated Name br j health psychol
ISSN 2044-8287
Aim and Scope
URL https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/20448287
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (74 total)

2014
review essay: dwayne tunstall, doing philosophy personally: thinking about metaphysics, theism, and antiblack racism (new york: fordham university press, 2013)
;Douglas Ficek
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 124-131
454 views DOI Abstract
2019
Ethnic differences in diurnal cortisol profiles in healthy adults: A meta-analysis.
Boileau, Kayla;Barbeau, Kheana;Sharma, Rupali;Bielajew, Catherine;
437 views DOI Abstract
2020
A collaborative approach to developing sustainable behaviour change interventions for childhood obesity prevention: Development of the Choosing Healthy Eating for Infant Health (CHErIsH) intervention and implementation strategy.
Toomey, Elaine;Matvienko-Sikar, Karen;Doherty, Edel;Harrington, Janas;Hayes, Catherine B;Heary, Caroline;Hennessy, Marita;Kelly, Colette;McHugh, Sheena;McSharry, Jenny;O'Halloran, Joanne;Queally, Michelle;Heffernan, Tony;Kearney, Patricia M;Byrne, Molly;
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
What are mass media interventions made of? Exploring the active content of interventions designed to increase HIV testing in gay men within a systematic review.
Flowers, Paul;Riddell, Julie;Boydell, Nicola;Teal, Gemma;Coia, Nicky;McDaid, Lisa;
377 views DOI Abstract
2016
Incorporating husband influences into a model of physical activity among older women.
Ranby, Krista W;Aiken, Leona S;
Vol. 21 , No. 3 , pp. 677-93
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Tinnitus groups: A model of social support and social connectedness from peer interaction.
Pryce, Helen;Moutela, Tiago;Bunker, Colette;Shaw, Rachel;
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
'We're all in the same boat': A qualitative study on how groups work in a diabetes prevention and management programme.
Borek, Aleksandra J;Abraham, Charles;Greaves, Colin J;Tarrant, Mark;Garner, Nikki;Pascale, Melanie;
353 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development and validation of a 6-item Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (RULS-6) using Rasch analysis.
Wongpakaran, Nahathai;Wongpakaran, Tinakon;Pinyopornpanish, Manee;Simcharoen, Sutapat;Suradom, Chawisa;Varnado, Pairada;Kuntawong, Pimolpun;
330 views DOI Abstract
2019
A cross-cultural comparison of the roles of emotional intelligence, metacognition, and negative coping for health-related quality of life in German versus Pakistani patients with chronic heart failure
Ghafoor, H.
Vol. 24 , pp. 828-846
310 views DOI
2019
'Every day I worry about something': A qualitative exploration of children's experiences of stress and coping.
Cheetham-Blake, Tara J;Family, Hannah E;Turner-Cobb, Julie M;
304 views DOI Abstract
View All 74 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
32
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

34.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.