Indexed in Journament
euro afro studies international journal
ISSN ISSN: 2707-8965· EN
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.2
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement,
accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content
distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata
are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather
than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never
affects this score or the ranking.
Full methodology →
About This Journal
The paper examines the mechanism for conflict resolution in traditional African societies before the advent of colonialism in the continent in which Yoruba society was x-rayed as a reference point. It is however noted, that in resolving conflict in traditional African societies, the platform always provide opportunity for the parties involved to interact, building consensus and provision of order in a given society. The traditional conflict resolution techniques such as mediation, negotiation, adjudication and reconciliation were also examined and the indigenous personalities in conflict resolution in African societies which includes kings and chiefs, ancestors, elders and family heads and family system. It is believed that the advent of colonialism attempted to wipe out the Africans’ methods of monitoring, preventing, managing and resolving conflicts. Africans also had their peculiar ways and manners of effecting peace-making, peace building, and confidence building. Based on these major roles played by indigenous knowledge in traditional African societies in conflict resolution beside the development process. It is concluded that, it is necessary however that the original African values must be revisited.
| Short Name | euro afro studies international journal |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated Name | easij |
| ISSN | ISSN: 2707-8965 |
| URL | https://www.easij.com |
Quality Profile
4 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal
Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score
AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing
8 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 4 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.
Show the numbers
| Dimension | This journal | Corpus average |
|---|---|---|
| Engagement | 30.1 | 30.1 |
| Accessibility | 35.0 | 17.9 |
| Timeliness | — | 19.2 |
| Diversity | — | 28.8 |
| Innovation | 70.0 | 31.2 |
| Community Impact | 0.7 | 13.4 |
| Content Distribution | — | 88.4 |
| Content Quality | — | 55.5 |
| Ethics & Transparency | — | 40.2 |
| Editorial Standards | — | 33.4 |
| Publication Regularity | — | 53.2 |
| Geographic Reach | — | 30.8 |
Articles (0)
No articles found
This journal doesn't have any indexed articles yet.