Indexed in Journament

journal of education and practice

ISSN ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,520 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
1 Articles
Scores higher than 60.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Previous studies have focused on the effective aspects of leadership in education and neglected the toxic aspects of educational leadership which is important to identify the behaviours of school leaders who intentionally and unknowingly inflict enduring damage on their followers and school organisation. Thus, this study examined the relationship between toxic leadership behaviour, followership characteristics and their productivity in Lagos State senior secondary schools. Three hypotheses (tested at 0.05 level of significance). With the study’s foundation anchored on correlational and descriptive research designs, its population comprised all Principals, Vice-principals, and teachers in public senior secondary schools in Lagos State. The sample sizes were 98 Principals, 196 Viceprincipals and 980 teachers after stratifying the population into Education Districts and thereafter selected through purposive sampling technique. Analysis was carried out using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Pearsons Product Moment Correlation Analysis and Regression Analysis were used to test the three hypotheses. Findings indicate that a positive and non-significant relationship existed between toxic leadership behaviour and followership commitment to work in Lagos State senior secondary schools (r = 0.025, ρ>0.05); the study also found that there was a negative and non-significant relationship between toxic leadership behaviour and followership loyalty in Lagos State senior secondary schools (r = -0.017, ρ>0.05), and the study further found that there is a positive relationship among toxic leadership behaviour, followership commitment to work, and followership loyalty with followership productivity in Lagos State senior secondary schools. It is concluded that toxic leadership is present in Lagos State public senior secondary schools, as evidenced in the study. The study therefore recommended that school teachers should be exposed to professional development training and opportunities particularly in leadership before placement for leadership positions, as leadership preparation and training are central to school effectiveness and school improvement, and qualified consultants with expertise in organisational leadership should be engaged during the search and selection processes of school leaders so as to detect toxic leaders in waiting.
Short Name journal of education and practice
Abbreviated Name jep
ISSN ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online)
URL https://www.iiste.org

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Accessibility 35.0
Timeliness 20.0
Innovation 12.0
Community Impact 0.7
Content Distribution 100.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of education and practice
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 35.0 20.4
Timeliness 20.0 5.8
Diversity 24.4
Innovation 12.0 25.7
Community Impact 0.7 5.8
Content Distribution 100.0 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (1)

Journament Score
35.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,520 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

35.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

12.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

0.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

100.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.