مجله پژوهش در علوم توانبخشی | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8041 / 33,987
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

مجله پژوهش در علوم توانبخشی

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name مجله پژوهش در علوم توانبخشی
Abbreviated Name مجله پژوهش در علوم توانبخشی
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2014
مروری بر کاربردهای سیستم BCI در علم توان‌بخشی با رویکرد بازتوانی ارتباط با محیط پیرامون
Bamdad, Mahdi;Zarshenas, Homayoon;Grailu, Hadi;
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. -
364 views Abstract
2015
niat untuk mengambil chartered accountant dengan theory of planned behavior
;Guhti Ayu Sri Wardani;Indira Januarti
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 140-159
338 views DOI Abstract
2013
Foot posture in basketball players with history of the shin splint
Forghany, Saeed;Dehkordi, Sajjad Bagherian;Sanech, Hossein Montazeri;Mashhadi, Mohammad;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 406-414
335 views Abstract
2013
struktur kepemilikan, mekanisme tata kelola perusahaan, dan biaya keagenan di indonesia (studi empirik pada perusahaan di bursa efek indonesia)
;Paulus Basuki Hadiprajitno
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 97-127
324 views DOI Abstract
2017
Pilot Study on the Effects of 10%-Incline Treadmill Walking in Patients with Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain; A Clinical Trial Study
Soleimanpoor, Reza;Karimi, Abdallkarim;
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 152-160
323 views Abstract
2016
a phenomenology of financial report of political parties in banten province
;Dahnil Anzar Simanjuntak
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 19-36
295 views DOI Abstract
2015
implementasi konsep new public management di dinas koperasi dan umkm kota surabaya
;Nur Sayidah;Alvy Mulyaningtyas;Mustika Winedar
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 39-52
289 views DOI Abstract
2015
pengaruh pengungkapan sukarela pada tanggung jawab manajemen atas laporan keuangan perusahaan terhadap manajemen laba (studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di bei tahun 2014)
;Rasis Ahmad Bani;Haryanto Haryanto
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 53-73
280 views DOI Abstract
2013
pengaruh variabel usaha dan keterampilan pada hubungan insentif moneter terhadap kinerja
;Laeli Budiarti
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 150-168
266 views DOI Abstract
2018
relevansi nilai revaluasi aset tetap dengan tingkat utang sebagai variabel moderasi
;Fransisca Ayudya Aryani;Agung Juliarto
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 1-21
262 views DOI Abstract
View All 15 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.