journal of fundamentals of mental health | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3924 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of fundamentals of mental health

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name journal of fundamentals of mental health
Abbreviated Name journal of fundamentals of mental health
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

2018
effects of a 12-week modified german volume training program on muscle strength and hypertrophy—a pilot study
;Daniel A. Hackett;Theban Amirthalingam;Lachlan Mitchell;Yorgi Mavros;Guy C. Wilson;Mark Halaki
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 7-
328 views DOI Abstract
2016
structural analysis of women’s heptathlon
;Freya Gassmann;Michael Fröhlich;Eike Emrich
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 12-
320 views DOI Abstract
2016
america’s cup sailing: effect of standing arm-cranking (“grinding”) direction on muscle activity, kinematics, and torque application
;Simon N. Pearson;Patria A. Hume;John Cronin;David Slyfield
Vol. 4 , No. 3 , pp. 37-
296 views DOI Abstract
2016
a comparison between chocolate milk and a raw milk honey solution’s influence on delayed onset of muscle soreness
;Andrew Hatchett;Christopher Berry;Claudia Oliva;Douglas Wiley;Jacob St. Hilaire;Alex LaRochelle
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 18-
286 views DOI Abstract
2017
self-concept in adolescents—relationship between sport participation, motor performance and personality traits
;Markus Klein;Michael Fröhlich;Eike Emrich
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 22-
283 views DOI Abstract
2016
vegetarian, gluten-free, and energy restricted diets in female athletes
;Lynn Cialdella-Kam;Danielle Kulpins;Melinda M. Manore
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 50-
274 views DOI Abstract
2016
improvement in 100-m sprint performance at an altitude of 2250 m
;Nicholas P. Linthorne
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 29-
268 views DOI Abstract
2016
relationship between procedural tactical knowledge and specific motor skills in young soccer players
;Rodrigo Aquino;Renato Francisco R. Marques;Grégory Hallé Petiot;Luiz Guilherme C. Gonçalves;Camila Moraes;Paulo Roberto P. Santiago;Enrico Fuini Puggina
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 52-
264 views DOI Abstract
2015
a comparison between learning style preferences, gender, sport and achievement in elite team sport athletes
;Andrea Braakhuis;Tea Williams;Elizabeth Fusco;Shawn Hueglin;Alex Popple
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 325-334
260 views DOI Abstract
2016
analysis of physiological, technical, and tactical analysis during a friendly football match of elite u19
;Juan Ignacio Ortega;Carlos Evangelio;Filipe Manuel Clemente;Fernando Manuel Lourenço Martins;Sixto González-Víllora
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 35-
255 views DOI Abstract
View All 26 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.