Indexed in Journament

medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation in ophthalmology

ISSN 2322-3219· EN

Journal Website Guide for Authors Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #23,868 of 29,301 scored journals (34,035 indexed)
8 Articles
Scores higher than 18.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Aim and Scope: “Medical Hypothesis, Discovery & Innovation in Ophthalmology” is an international peer-reviewed (double-blind) journal published since January 2012. We attempt to publish basic and clinical science studies related to the ophthalmology. Furthermore, we publish evidence-based ideas and hypotheses, look for discoveries, minimally invasive surgeries, new modalities of treatment, innovative instruments and any manuscript that contains creativity and ideas in visual sciences. Published manuscripts should have not been accepted or will not be published elsewhere. Manuscripts should be devoid of any ethical problem or malpractice. This journal is currently indexed at Embase, Chemical Abstracts, PubMed Central, Scopus, ProQuest and PubsHub. The Journal is a member of the ICMJE and the Journal editor is the member of WAME at present. In case of any ethical malpractice (fraud, plagiarism, etc.), we treat based on the guidelines of WAME, ICMJE and all principles presented at this webpage.
Short Name med hypothesis discov innov ophthalmol
Abbreviated Name mhdio
ISSN 2322-3219
URL http://mehdijournal.com/index.php/mehdiophthalmol
Author Instructions http://mehdijournal.com/index.php/mehdiophthalmol/about/submissions

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Accessibility 45.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 1.5
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 75.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.6
Accessibility 45.0 23.3
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity — 25.9
Innovation 1.5 24.1
Community Impact 5.7 6.7
Content Distribution 75.6 89.8
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (8)

2020
Dramatic Resolution of Recalcitrant Cystoid Macular Edema after Concurrent Intravitreal Injection of Bevacizumab and Triamcinolone
Kakarla V. Chalam;Suzie Gasparian;Moises Enghelberg;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 159-163
547 views DOI Abstract
2020
Glaucomatous Macular Vasculature: A Quantitative Analysis
Pedro Arede;Joanna Przezdziecka-Dolyk;Fabian Debowy;Jacek Olszewski;Carla Fernandes;Carolina Bruxelas;Helena Spohr;Sara Patricio;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 185-197
370 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Antiangiogenic Properties of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells in Corneal Neovascularization in a Rabbit Model
Demetrios Pirounides;Anastasia Komnenou;Nikolaos Papaioannou;Eleni Gounari;Ioanna Stylianaki;Alexandros Alexandridis;Angeliki Chranioti;Evangelia Kofidou;Georgios Koliakos;Vasileios Karampatakis;
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 74-84
323 views DOI Abstract
2020
European Vitreoretinal Society Macular Hole Study, Prognostic Factors for Anatomical and Functional Success
Barbara Parolini;Zofia Michalewska;Joshua S Hardin;Didier Ducournau;Ihab Saad Othman;Mohammed F. Faramawi;Ron A. Adelman;Ahmed B. Sallam;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 198-207
318 views DOI Abstract
2020
Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration as First Choice: a New Italian Ruling
Stefano Erba;Antonio Scialdone;Giuseppe Casalino;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 179-184
315 views DOI Abstract
2020
Validation of Neural Network Predictions for the Outcome of Refractive Surgery for Myopia
Miltos Balidis;Ioanna Papadopoulou;Dimitris Malandris;Zachos Zachariadis;Dimitrios Sakellaris;Solon Asteriadis;Marios Poulos;Zisis Gatzioufas;George Anogeianakis;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 172-178
243 views DOI Abstract
2020
Myopia Control: A Citation Network Study
Cesar Villa-Collar;Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina;Miguel Angel Sanchez-Tena;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 208-214
219 views DOI Abstract
2020
How to Face COVID-19 in Ophthalmology Practice
Xiaoting Pei;Xinwei Jiao;Dingli Lu;Di Qi;Shenzhen Huang;Zhijie Li;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 164-171
172 views DOI Abstract
2020
How to Face COVID-19 in Ophthalmology Practice
Xiaoting Pei;Xinwei Jiao;Dingli Lu;Di Qi;Shenzhen Huang;Zhijie Li;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 164-171
172 views DOI Abstract
2020
European Vitreoretinal Society Macular Hole Study, Prognostic Factors for Anatomical and Functional Success
Barbara Parolini;Zofia Michalewska;Joshua S Hardin;Didier Ducournau;Ihab Saad Othman;Mohammed F. Faramawi;Ron A. Adelman;Ahmed B. Sallam;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 198-207
318 views DOI Abstract
2020
Validation of Neural Network Predictions for the Outcome of Refractive Surgery for Myopia
Miltos Balidis;Ioanna Papadopoulou;Dimitris Malandris;Zachos Zachariadis;Dimitrios Sakellaris;Solon Asteriadis;Marios Poulos;Zisis Gatzioufas;George Anogeianakis;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 172-178
243 views DOI Abstract
2020
Myopia Control: A Citation Network Study
Cesar Villa-Collar;Cristina Alvarez-Peregrina;Miguel Angel Sanchez-Tena;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 208-214
219 views DOI Abstract
2020
Dramatic Resolution of Recalcitrant Cystoid Macular Edema after Concurrent Intravitreal Injection of Bevacizumab and Triamcinolone
Kakarla V. Chalam;Suzie Gasparian;Moises Enghelberg;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 159-163
547 views DOI Abstract
2020
Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration as First Choice: a New Italian Ruling
Stefano Erba;Antonio Scialdone;Giuseppe Casalino;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 179-184
315 views DOI Abstract
2020
Glaucomatous Macular Vasculature: A Quantitative Analysis
Pedro Arede;Joanna Przezdziecka-Dolyk;Fabian Debowy;Jacek Olszewski;Carla Fernandes;Carolina Bruxelas;Helena Spohr;Sara Patricio;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 185-197
370 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Antiangiogenic Properties of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells in Corneal Neovascularization in a Rabbit Model
Demetrios Pirounides;Anastasia Komnenou;Nikolaos Papaioannou;Eleni Gounari;Ioanna Stylianaki;Alexandros Alexandridis;Angeliki Chranioti;Evangelia Kofidou;Georgios Koliakos;Vasileios Karampatakis;
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 74-84
323 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #23,868 of 29,301 scored
(34,035 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

28.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

45.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

1.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.