Indexed in Journament

Translational animal science

ISSN 2573-2102· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,501 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
68 Articles
Scores higher than 36.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Transl Anim Sci
Abbreviated Name transl anim sci
ISSN 2573-2102

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 100.0
Innovation 12.0
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 15.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Translational animal science
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 100.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 12.0 31.2
Community Impact 4.3 13.4
Content Distribution 15.6 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (68)

2020
Assessing the effects of medium-chain fatty acids and fat sources on PEDV infectivity.
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. txz179
324 views DOI Abstract
2023
Water binders in beef patties increase yield and extend shelf life.
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. txad091
164 views DOI Abstract
2026
Estimation of the sample size to determine gas flux in finishing steers under confined conditions using alternative statistical approaches
43 views DOI Abstract
2026
Effects of novel specialty soy protein products on growth performance and fecal dry matter of nursery pigs
36 views DOI Abstract
2026
Effect of sulfate or hydroxychloride sources and levels of copper, manganese, and zinc on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and body weight variation of finishing pigs
29 views DOI Abstract
2026
Effects of feeding a <i>Bacillus</i> -based direct-fed microbial during a 60-day receiving program on performance and physiological responses of feeder cattle
27 views DOI Abstract
2026
Effects of a cheese co-product fed in lactation and nursery diets on sow, litter, and subsequent nursery pig performance
25 views DOI Abstract
2026
Evaluation of elevated soybean meal diets with inclusion of exogenous enzymes on the effect of growth performance and digestibility
22 views DOI Abstract
2026
Methionine supplementation during late gestation in March calving Angus crossbred beef heifers and cows
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Evaluation of large language model performance in translating dairy-related content
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Effect of sample storage on pH-value in equine faeces
5 views DOI Abstract
2026
Association of origin, performance, and health metrics of beef-on-dairy feedyard cattle with liver abscess at harvest
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
High Shear Dry Extruded Corn in Feedlot Receiving Diets
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Inoculant Effects on Limpograss Silage Nutritive Value, Fermentation Characteristics, Microbiology, and in vitro Gas Production
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Effects of increasing trypsin inhibitor on nursery pig growth performance, fecal dry matter, and nutrient digestibility
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Continuous NU <i>track</i> monitoring revealed acute suppression and later changes in behavior after lipopolysaccharide challenge in nursery pigs
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
Journament Score
33.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,501 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

12.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

15.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.