Clinical laboratory | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5944 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

Clinical laboratory

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name Clin Lab
Abbreviated Name clin lab
ISSN 1433-6510
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2019
Semi-Quantitative Impacts of Major Step on Antigen in Pre-Treatment Required for Immunohistochemistry.
Feng, Xinyan;Wang, Wenbo;Liu, Hui;
Vol. 65 , No. 9
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hematological Indices of Pregnant Women at the University of Gondar Referral Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: a Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.
Alemu, Aynadis;Abebe, Molla;Terefe, Betelihem;Yesuf, Mohammed;Melku, Mulugeta;Enawgaw, Bamlaku;Biadgo, Belete;
Vol. 65 , No. 8
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Pre-Analytical Performance Evaluation for Measurement of Serum Creatinine in a Multicenter Clinical Trial Study.
Wan, Zemin;Zhang, Lu;Ke, Peifeng;Chao, Yan;Mao, Wei;Huang, Xianzhang;Zhuang, Junhua;Zhang, Lei;Li, Chuang;Wu, Yifan;Liu, Xusheng;Xu, Jianhua;
Vol. 65 , No. 10
332 views DOI Abstract
2015
krokot extract (portulaca oleracea. l) as natural light-harvesting pigments for dye-sensitized solar cells (dsscs) : influence of dye acidity
;Cici Nurfaizah;Didik Krisdiyanto;Khamidinal Khamidinal;Sudarlin Sudarlin
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 17-24
332 views DOI Abstract
2017
analysis of bull sperm dna abnormalities due to cadmium accumulation
;Fuad Fitriawan
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 5-8
290 views DOI Abstract
2020
Role of Pernicious Anemia in Patients Admitted to Internal Medicine with Vitamin B12 Deficiency and Oral Replacement Therapy as a Treatment Option.
Harmandar, Ferda A;Dolu, Süleyman;Çekin, Ayhan H;
Vol. 66 , No. 3
284 views DOI Abstract
2018
Short-Term Effect of High-Dose Pantoprazol on Serum and Urinary Magnesium Levels.
Uyar, Seyit;Dolu, Suleyman;Yolcular, Basak O;Ellidag, Hamit Y;Kok, Mehmet;Bostan, Feyzi;Sahinturk, Yasin;Cekin, Ayhan H;
Vol. 64 , No. 3 , pp. 263-268
283 views DOI Abstract
2014
ecopharmacognosy: exploring the chemical and biological potential of nature for human health
;Geoffrey A. Cordell
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 1-14
277 views DOI Abstract
2017
Fibulin Levels in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease and Its Relationship to Arterial Stiffness.
Inci, A;Akin, O;Ellidag, H Y;Eren, E;Dolu, S;Sari, F;
Vol. 63 , No. 11 , pp. 1869-1874
253 views DOI Abstract
2015
substitution and haplotype diversity analysis on the partial sequence of the mitochondrial dna cyt b of indonesian swamp buffalo (bubalus bubalis)
;Akhmad Sukri;Mohamad Amin;Aris Winaya;Abdul Gofur
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 59-63
252 views DOI Abstract
View All 13 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.