Indexed in Journament

disability and rehabilitation assistive technology

ISSN 1748-3115· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,285 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
11 Articles
Scores higher than 61.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name disabil rehabil assist technol
Abbreviated Name disabil rehabil assist technol
ISSN 1748-3115
URL http://www.tandfonline.com/iidt

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 38.9 22.7
Innovation 46.5 24.1
Community Impact 10.7 4.2
Content Distribution 81.1 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (11)

2019
The influence of social context on the perception of assistive technology: using a semantic differential scale to compare young adults' views from the United Kingdom and Pakistan.
Asghar, Salman;Edward Torrens, George;Iftikhar, Hassan;Welsh, Ruth;Harland, Robert;
, pp. 1-14
461 views DOI Abstract
2019
Stakeholder perspectives on research and development priorities for mobility assistive-technology: a literature review.
Alqahtani, Saleh;Joseph, James;Dicianno, Brad;Layton, Natasha Ann;Toro, Maria Luisa;Ferretti, Eliana;Tuakli-Wosornu, Yetsa A;Chhabra, Harvinder;Neyedli, Heather;Lopes, Celia Regina;Alqahtani, Mazen M;Van de Vliet, Peter;Kumagaya, Shin-Ichiro;Kim, Jong-Bae;McKinney, Vic;Yang, Yu-Sheng;Goldberg, Mary;Cooper, Rory;
, pp. 1-15
415 views DOI Abstract
2014
Technology transfer of hearing aids to low and middle income countries: policy and market factors.
Seelman, Katherine D;Werner, Roye;
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 399-407
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of assistive technology for students with reading and writing disabilities.
Svensson, Idor;Nordström, Thomas;Lindeblad, Emma;Gustafson, Stefan;Björn, Marianne;Sand, Christina;Almgren/Bäck, Gunilla;Nilsson, Staffan;
, pp. 1-13
394 views DOI Abstract
2018
Reliability of the Spanish version of the wheelchair skills test 4.2 for manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury.
Passuni, Diego;Dalzotto, Elisa;F Gath, Christian;Buffetti, Eliana;Elizalde, Milagros;Jarmoluk, Verónica;Russo, Maria J;Intruvini, Silvia;Olmos, Lisandro E;Freixes, Orestes;
, pp. 1-4
388 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effects of domestic mechanical knee joints on pelvic motion in transfemoral amputees.
Alsancak, Serap;Guner, Senem;Celebi, Fatih;
, pp. 1-7
383 views DOI Abstract
2014
Emerging issues and current trends in assistive technology use 2007-2010: practising, assisting and enabling learning for all.
Abbott, Chris;Brown, David;Evett, Lindsay;Standen, Penny;
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. 453-62
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
The inter-rater reliability of the Wheelchair Interface Questionnaire.
Davis, Abigail Bridey;Sheafer, Vicki;Rispin, Karen;Layton, Natasha;
, pp. 1-6
372 views DOI Abstract
2019
InWalker: smart white cane for the blind.
Husin, Mohd Heikal;Lim, Yang Kwang;
, pp. 1-7
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
Traumatic quadruple amputee rehabilitation: from amputation to prosthetic functionality: a case report.
Monné Cuevas, Pol;Borrás Correa, Andrea;Vidal Fortuny, Eloïna;Ángeles Diaz Vela, Maria;Calvo Sanz, Jordi;
, pp. 1-7
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
InWalker: smart white cane for the blind.
Husin, Mohd Heikal;Lim, Yang Kwang;
, pp. 1-7
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
The influence of social context on the perception of assistive technology: using a semantic differential scale to compare young adults' views from the United Kingdom and Pakistan.
Asghar, Salman;Edward Torrens, George;Iftikhar, Hassan;Welsh, Ruth;Harland, Robert;
, pp. 1-14
461 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of assistive technology for students with reading and writing disabilities.
Svensson, Idor;Nordström, Thomas;Lindeblad, Emma;Gustafson, Stefan;Björn, Marianne;Sand, Christina;Almgren/Bäck, Gunilla;Nilsson, Staffan;
, pp. 1-13
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
Stakeholder perspectives on research and development priorities for mobility assistive-technology: a literature review.
Alqahtani, Saleh;Joseph, James;Dicianno, Brad;Layton, Natasha Ann;Toro, Maria Luisa;Ferretti, Eliana;Tuakli-Wosornu, Yetsa A;Chhabra, Harvinder;Neyedli, Heather;Lopes, Celia Regina;Alqahtani, Mazen M;Van de Vliet, Peter;Kumagaya, Shin-Ichiro;Kim, Jong-Bae;McKinney, Vic;Yang, Yu-Sheng;Goldberg, Mary;Cooper, Rory;
, pp. 1-15
415 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effects of domestic mechanical knee joints on pelvic motion in transfemoral amputees.
Alsancak, Serap;Guner, Senem;Celebi, Fatih;
, pp. 1-7
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
Traumatic quadruple amputee rehabilitation: from amputation to prosthetic functionality: a case report.
Monné Cuevas, Pol;Borrás Correa, Andrea;Vidal Fortuny, Eloïna;Ángeles Diaz Vela, Maria;Calvo Sanz, Jordi;
, pp. 1-7
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
The inter-rater reliability of the Wheelchair Interface Questionnaire.
Davis, Abigail Bridey;Sheafer, Vicki;Rispin, Karen;Layton, Natasha;
, pp. 1-6
372 views DOI Abstract
2018
Reliability of the Spanish version of the wheelchair skills test 4.2 for manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury.
Passuni, Diego;Dalzotto, Elisa;F Gath, Christian;Buffetti, Eliana;Elizalde, Milagros;Jarmoluk, Verónica;Russo, Maria J;Intruvini, Silvia;Olmos, Lisandro E;Freixes, Orestes;
, pp. 1-4
388 views DOI Abstract
2017
feel experience dan think experience marketing pengaruhnya terhadap loyalitas konsumen melalui kepuasan konsumen sebagai variabel intervening
;Asti Hidayati;Siska Ernawati Fatimah
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 167-174
56 views Abstract
2014
Emerging issues and current trends in assistive technology use 2007-2010: practising, assisting and enabling learning for all.
Abbott, Chris;Brown, David;Evett, Lindsay;Standen, Penny;
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. 453-62
382 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,285 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

38.9/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

46.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

81.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.