Indexed in Journament

disability and rehabilitation assistive technology

ISSN 1748-3115· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.4/100
Journament Score
#2,575
Journament Rank
11
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name disabil rehabil assist technol
Abbreviated Name disabil rehabil assist technol
ISSN 1748-3115
URL http://www.tandfonline.com/iidt

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (11)

2019
The influence of social context on the perception of assistive technology: using a semantic differential scale to compare young adults' views from the United Kingdom and Pakistan.
Asghar, Salman;Edward Torrens, George;Iftikhar, Hassan;Welsh, Ruth;Harland, Robert;
, pp. 1-14
415 views DOI Abstract
2019
Stakeholder perspectives on research and development priorities for mobility assistive-technology: a literature review.
Alqahtani, Saleh;Joseph, James;Dicianno, Brad;Layton, Natasha Ann;Toro, Maria Luisa;Ferretti, Eliana;Tuakli-Wosornu, Yetsa A;Chhabra, Harvinder;Neyedli, Heather;Lopes, Celia Regina;Alqahtani, Mazen M;Van de Vliet, Peter;Kumagaya, Shin-Ichiro;Kim, Jong-Bae;McKinney, Vic;Yang, Yu-Sheng;Goldberg, Mary;Cooper, Rory;
, pp. 1-15
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of assistive technology for students with reading and writing disabilities.
Svensson, Idor;Nordström, Thomas;Lindeblad, Emma;Gustafson, Stefan;Björn, Marianne;Sand, Christina;Almgren/Bäck, Gunilla;Nilsson, Staffan;
, pp. 1-13
371 views DOI Abstract
2014
Technology transfer of hearing aids to low and middle income countries: policy and market factors.
Seelman, Katherine D;Werner, Roye;
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 399-407
367 views DOI Abstract
2018
Reliability of the Spanish version of the wheelchair skills test 4.2 for manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury.
Passuni, Diego;Dalzotto, Elisa;F Gath, Christian;Buffetti, Eliana;Elizalde, Milagros;Jarmoluk, Verónica;Russo, Maria J;Intruvini, Silvia;Olmos, Lisandro E;Freixes, Orestes;
, pp. 1-4
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effects of domestic mechanical knee joints on pelvic motion in transfemoral amputees.
Alsancak, Serap;Guner, Senem;Celebi, Fatih;
, pp. 1-7
362 views DOI Abstract
2014
Emerging issues and current trends in assistive technology use 2007-2010: practising, assisting and enabling learning for all.
Abbott, Chris;Brown, David;Evett, Lindsay;Standen, Penny;
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. 453-62
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
The inter-rater reliability of the Wheelchair Interface Questionnaire.
Davis, Abigail Bridey;Sheafer, Vicki;Rispin, Karen;Layton, Natasha;
, pp. 1-6
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
InWalker: smart white cane for the blind.
Husin, Mohd Heikal;Lim, Yang Kwang;
, pp. 1-7
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
Traumatic quadruple amputee rehabilitation: from amputation to prosthetic functionality: a case report.
Monné Cuevas, Pol;Borrás Correa, Andrea;Vidal Fortuny, Eloïna;Ángeles Diaz Vela, Maria;Calvo Sanz, Jordi;
, pp. 1-7
297 views DOI Abstract
2019
InWalker: smart white cane for the blind.
Husin, Mohd Heikal;Lim, Yang Kwang;
, pp. 1-7
328 views DOI Abstract
2019
The influence of social context on the perception of assistive technology: using a semantic differential scale to compare young adults' views from the United Kingdom and Pakistan.
Asghar, Salman;Edward Torrens, George;Iftikhar, Hassan;Welsh, Ruth;Harland, Robert;
, pp. 1-14
415 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of assistive technology for students with reading and writing disabilities.
Svensson, Idor;Nordström, Thomas;Lindeblad, Emma;Gustafson, Stefan;Björn, Marianne;Sand, Christina;Almgren/Bäck, Gunilla;Nilsson, Staffan;
, pp. 1-13
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Stakeholder perspectives on research and development priorities for mobility assistive-technology: a literature review.
Alqahtani, Saleh;Joseph, James;Dicianno, Brad;Layton, Natasha Ann;Toro, Maria Luisa;Ferretti, Eliana;Tuakli-Wosornu, Yetsa A;Chhabra, Harvinder;Neyedli, Heather;Lopes, Celia Regina;Alqahtani, Mazen M;Van de Vliet, Peter;Kumagaya, Shin-Ichiro;Kim, Jong-Bae;McKinney, Vic;Yang, Yu-Sheng;Goldberg, Mary;Cooper, Rory;
, pp. 1-15
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
The effects of domestic mechanical knee joints on pelvic motion in transfemoral amputees.
Alsancak, Serap;Guner, Senem;Celebi, Fatih;
, pp. 1-7
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Traumatic quadruple amputee rehabilitation: from amputation to prosthetic functionality: a case report.
Monné Cuevas, Pol;Borrás Correa, Andrea;Vidal Fortuny, Eloïna;Ángeles Diaz Vela, Maria;Calvo Sanz, Jordi;
, pp. 1-7
297 views DOI Abstract
2019
The inter-rater reliability of the Wheelchair Interface Questionnaire.
Davis, Abigail Bridey;Sheafer, Vicki;Rispin, Karen;Layton, Natasha;
, pp. 1-6
352 views DOI Abstract
2018
Reliability of the Spanish version of the wheelchair skills test 4.2 for manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury.
Passuni, Diego;Dalzotto, Elisa;F Gath, Christian;Buffetti, Eliana;Elizalde, Milagros;Jarmoluk, Verónica;Russo, Maria J;Intruvini, Silvia;Olmos, Lisandro E;Freixes, Orestes;
, pp. 1-4
366 views DOI Abstract
2017
feel experience dan think experience marketing pengaruhnya terhadap loyalitas konsumen melalui kepuasan konsumen sebagai variabel intervening
;Asti Hidayati;Siska Ernawati Fatimah
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 167-174
38 views Abstract
2014
Emerging issues and current trends in assistive technology use 2007-2010: practising, assisting and enabling learning for all.
Abbott, Chris;Brown, David;Evett, Lindsay;Standen, Penny;
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. 453-62
358 views DOI Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.