Indexed in Journament

alzheimer's & dementia (new york, n y)

ISSN 2352-8737· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.0/100
Journament Score
#7,501
Journament Rank
24
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name alzheimers dement (n y)
Abbreviated Name alzheimers dement (n y)
ISSN 2352-8737
URL http://www.trci.alzdem.com

Indexings

ncbi

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2015
2019
A single systemic inflammatory insult causes acute motor deficits and accelerates disease progression in a mouse model of human tauopathy.
Vol. 5 , pp. 579-591
437 views DOI Abstract
2016
Mnemonic strategy training of the elderly at risk for dementia enhances integration of information processing via cross-frequency coupling.
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 241-249
426 views DOI Abstract
2014
potentiality of the usage of compressed natural gas for competitiveness in service delivery industries
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. -
411 views Abstract
2019
Perceptions of precision medicine among diverse dementia caregivers and professional providers.
Vol. 5 , pp. 468-474
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
The case-finding study: A novel community-based research recruitment approach for engaging participants with early cognitive decline.
Vol. 5 , pp. 501-507
390 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pharmaceutical company payments to the authors of the Japanese dementia clinical practice guidelines in 2016.
Vol. 5 , pp. 228-230
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Longitudinal analysis of risk factors for dementia based on Mild Cognitive Impairment Screen results and questionnaire responses from healthy Japanese individuals registered in an online database.
Vol. 5 , pp. 347-353
372 views DOI Abstract
2012
factors affecting customer’s perception of service quality: comparing differences among countries - case study: beauty salons in bandung and tokyo
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. -
277 views Abstract
2012
an analysis of inventory management of t-shirt at mahanagari bandung pisan
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. -
267 views Abstract
2019
A single systemic inflammatory insult causes acute motor deficits and accelerates disease progression in a mouse model of human tauopathy.
Vol. 5 , pp. 579-591
437 views DOI Abstract
2019
The case-finding study: A novel community-based research recruitment approach for engaging participants with early cognitive decline.
Vol. 5 , pp. 501-507
390 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perceptions of precision medicine among diverse dementia caregivers and professional providers.
Vol. 5 , pp. 468-474
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pharmaceutical company payments to the authors of the Japanese dementia clinical practice guidelines in 2016.
Vol. 5 , pp. 228-230
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Longitudinal analysis of risk factors for dementia based on Mild Cognitive Impairment Screen results and questionnaire responses from healthy Japanese individuals registered in an online database.
Vol. 5 , pp. 347-353
372 views DOI Abstract
2017
Toward common mechanisms for risk factors in Alzheimer's syndrome.
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 571-578
197 views DOI Abstract
2016
modeling and analyzing academic researcher behavior
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 80-87
243 views DOI Abstract
2016
Mnemonic strategy training of the elderly at risk for dementia enhances integration of information processing via cross-frequency coupling.
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 241-249
426 views DOI Abstract
2015
2014
a bottom-up trend in research of management of technology
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. -
83 views Abstract
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.