Indexed in Journament

International wound journal

ISSN 1742-481X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.2/100
Journament Score
#5,266
Journament Rank
22
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Int Wound J
Abbreviated Name int wound j
ISSN 1742-481X
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1742481x

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (22)

2019
Participant experiences in a feasibility trial of supervised exercise training in adults with venous leg ulcers: A qualitative study.
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
Aged garlic extract preserves cutaneous microcirculation in patients with increased risk for cardiovascular diseases: A double-blinded placebo-controlled study.
348 views DOI Abstract
2020
The value of F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing and localising deep sternal wound infection to guide surgical debridement.
Vol. 143 , pp. 373-381
329 views DOI Abstract
2013
Necrotising fasciitis in the central part of the body: diagnosis, management and review of the literature.
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 466-72
319 views DOI Abstract
2018
update on minimally invasive surgery and benign prostatic hyperplasia
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 22-27
314 views DOI Abstract
2016
prostate cancer volume associates with preoperative plasma levels of testosterone that independently predicts high grade tumours which show low densities (quotient testosterone/tumour volume)
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 26-32
305 views DOI Abstract
2015
ureteral stent technology: drug-eluting stents and stent coatings
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 194-201
298 views DOI Abstract
2019
Studying the effect of structured ostomy care training on quality of life and anxiety of patients with permanent ostomy.
295 views DOI Abstract
2022
Another year another variant: COVID 3.0-Omicron.
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 5
174 views DOI
2020
The value of F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing and localising deep sternal wound infection to guide surgical debridement.
Vol. 143 , pp. 373-381
329 views DOI Abstract
2019
Participant experiences in a feasibility trial of supervised exercise training in adults with venous leg ulcers: A qualitative study.
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
Aged garlic extract preserves cutaneous microcirculation in patients with increased risk for cardiovascular diseases: A double-blinded placebo-controlled study.
348 views DOI Abstract
2019
Studying the effect of structured ostomy care training on quality of life and anxiety of patients with permanent ostomy.
295 views DOI Abstract
2018
update on minimally invasive surgery and benign prostatic hyperplasia
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 22-27
314 views DOI Abstract
2018
non-invasive evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms (luts) in men
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 42-47
177 views DOI Abstract
2017
robotic nurse duties in the urology operative room: 11 years of experience
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 116-123
237 views DOI Abstract
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

41.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.