journal of chemical technology and biotechnology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#518 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
43.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of chemical technology and biotechnology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name journal of chemical technology and biotechnology
Abbreviated Name journal of chemical technology and biotechnology
ISSN 0268-2575
Aim and Scope
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4660
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2019
Improved enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol production by combined alkaline peroxide and ionic liquid-water mixtures pretreatment of rice straw
Hong, Y.
Vol. 94 , pp. 1451-1459
311 views DOI
2018
Treatment of petroleum wastewater using an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and turf soil as a support material
Wang, Q.
Vol. 93 , pp. 3317-3325
308 views DOI
2020
Removal of chlorophyll and tannins from Anthocleista schweinfurthii Gilg leaves by electrocoagulation using iron electrodes: optimization using response surface methodology
Tsopjio, F.N.
Vol. 95 , pp. 2001-2008
274 views DOI
2013
procalcitonin as an indicator of urosepsis
;Sugimoto K;Adomi S;Koike H;Esa A
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 77-80
249 views Abstract
2019
Preparation of poly(2,4,6-triaminopyrimidine-TMC)/P84 composite nanofiltration membrane with enhanced chlorine resistance and solvent resistance
Han, R.
Vol. 94 , pp. 2838-2843
244 views DOI
2014
emerging treatments for overactive bladder: clinical potential of botulinum toxins
;Tincello DG;Rashid T;Revicky V
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 51-57
238 views Abstract
2016
the use of urologic investigations among patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries
;Welk B;Liu K;Shariff SZ
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 27-34
232 views Abstract
2017
In Focus: Biotechnology and chemical technology for biorefineries and biofuel production
Martinez, A.
Vol. 92 , pp. 897-898
206 views DOI
2020
Active chemical fractions with high fungistatic activity of humic-like substances obtained via different extraction solvents
Wei, S.
Vol. 95 , pp. 585-593
205 views DOI
2015
novel targeted bladder drug-delivery systems: a review
;Zacchè MM;Srikrishna S;Cardozo L
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 169-178
127 views Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

43.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.