international journal of energy research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3046 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

international journal of energy research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name international journal of energy research
Abbreviated Name international journal of energy research
ISSN 0363-907X
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1099114X
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2019
Highly efficient hydrolysis of magnetic milled powder from waste aluminum (Al) cans with low-concentrated alkaline solution for hydrogen generation
Yang, H.
Vol. 43 , pp. 4797-4806
318 views DOI
2019
Study on nonpremixed methane/air combustion from flame structure and NO<inf>X</inf> emission aspect for different burner head structures
Büyükakın, M.
Vol. 43 , pp. 5421-5437
277 views DOI
2020
LiNi<inf>1/3</inf>Co<inf>1/3</inf>Mn<inf>1/3</inf>O<inf>2</inf>/polypyrrole composites as cathode materials for high-performance lithium-ion batteries
Zhu, L.
Vol. 44 , pp. 298-308
269 views DOI
2017
[re]thinking internship for business administration students during their professional training: a study about the brazilian scientific production
;Fernanda Roda de Souza Araújo Cassundé;Maurício Vitor Souza Oliveira;Maria Tereza Caldas Alencar;Nilson Fernando Marcos Rodrigues;Elias Eduardo Damasceno Rodrigues
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 594-623
254 views DOI Abstract
2014
the bonaparte group: learning from a chain of restaurants in brazil’s northeast
;Viviane Santos Salazar;Walter Fernando Araújo de Moraes;Yákara Vasconcelos Pereira Leite
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 173-193
228 views DOI Abstract
2019
Thermal desalination of ballast water using onboard waste heat in marine industry
Gude, V.
Vol. 43 , pp. 6026-6037
224 views DOI
2017
traces of social and intercultural experiences of students in international mobility: from friendship ties to "hardship"
;Cintia Rodrigues de Oliveira Medeiros;Antonia Darliane da Silva Andrade;Janduhy Camilo Passos
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 195-229
201 views DOI Abstract
2018
inovações no ensino superior. metodologias inovadoras de aprendizagem e suas relações com o mundo do trabalho: desafios para a transformação de uma cultura
;Maria Inês Fini
Vol. 19 , No. 1 , pp. 176-183
198 views DOI Abstract
2017
snapping up the market: the rock hamburgueria case
;Ana Paula Kieling;Estela Maria Hoffmann;Ricardo Boeing
Vol. 18 , No. 1 , pp. 153-186
180 views DOI Abstract
2014
avaliaÇÃo da percepÇÃo de discentes e docentes sobre novas tecnologias de ensino em cursos de graduaÇÃo em administraÇÃo
;Fábio Pimenta de Pádua Júnior;João Pereira de Castilho Filho;Pedro José Steiner Neto;Zaki Akel Sobrinho
Vol. 15 , No. 2 , pp. 295-321
177 views DOI Abstract
View All 20 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.