Indexed in Journament

extremophiles : life under extreme conditions

ISSN 1433-4909· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #12,995 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
17 Articles
Scores higher than 55.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name extremophiles
Abbreviated Name extremophiles
ISSN 1433-4909
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/792

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for extremophiles : life under extreme conditions
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 55.6 24.4
Innovation 33.0 25.7
Community Impact 9.3 5.8
Content Distribution 73.5 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2008
Isolation and identification of species of Alicyclobacillus from orchard soil in the Western Cape, South Africa.
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 159-63
318 views Abstract
2017
hemoglobin a1c, diabetes mellitus, diabetic nephropathy and chronic kidney disease
Vol. 37 , No. 4 , pp. 225-242
307 views Abstract
2001
Archaeology of Archaea: geomicrobiological record of Pleistocene thermal events concealed in a deep-sea subseafloor environment.
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. 385-92
298 views Abstract
2019
Identification of a novel protease from the thermophilic Anoxybacillus kamchatkensis M1V and its application as laundry detergent additive.
290 views DOI Abstract
2016
hyperuricemia, chronic renal disease and renal transplant (part ii)
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. 124-136
286 views Abstract
2015
2017
dynamic enoxaparin dosage in critical care patient with increased renal clearance
Vol. 37 , No. 3 , pp. 167-171
262 views
2016
ergotamine intoxication and arf
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. 62-64
203 views
2019
Identification of a novel protease from the thermophilic Anoxybacillus kamchatkensis M1V and its application as laundry detergent additive.
290 views DOI Abstract
2017
in vitro susceptibility testing to antimicrobial agents of urinary tract infection bacteria in women: a 5-year retrospective study
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. 96-103
155 views Abstract
2017
delayed graft function on kidney transplant recipients
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. 182-187
124 views Abstract
2017
calciphylaxis after renal transplant. three clinical cases report
Vol. 36 , No. 1 , pp. 12-20
132 views Abstract
2017
dynamic enoxaparin dosage in critical care patient with increased renal clearance
Vol. 37 , No. 3 , pp. 167-171
262 views
2017
estimated glomerular filtration rate in a sample of university students. argentina, 2014-2015. preliminary results
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. 196-201
154 views Abstract
2017
hemoglobin a1c, diabetes mellitus, diabetic nephropathy and chronic kidney disease
Vol. 37 , No. 4 , pp. 225-242
307 views Abstract
2017
first global kidney policy forum
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. 79-80
171 views
Journament Score
33.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #12,995 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

33.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.