international journal of industrial chemistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2758 / 33,968
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

international journal of industrial chemistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name international journal of industrial chemistry
Abbreviated Name international journal of industrial chemistry
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (9 total)

2018
Aging studies of a polypropylene and natural rubber blend
Bendjaouahdou, Chaouki;Bensaad, Salima;
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 345-352
420 views Abstract
2012
intravenous immunoglobulin and mycophenolate mofetil for long-standing sensory neuronopathy in sjögren's syndrome
;Maria Giovanna Danieli;Lucia Pettinari;Ramona Morariu;Fernando Monteforte;Francesco Logullo
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
413 views DOI Abstract
2015
does the maternal serum igg level during pregnancy in primary antibody deficiency influence the igg level in the newborn?
;Vasantha Nagendran;Noel Emmanuel;Amolak S. Bansal
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
351 views DOI Abstract
2016
early diagnosis and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for il10r deficiency leading to very early-onset inflammatory bowel disease are essential in familial cases
;Neslihan Edeer Karaca;Guzide Aksu;Ezgi Ulusoy;Serap Aksoylar;Salih Gozmen;Ferah Genel;Sanem Akarcan;Nesrin Gulez;Tatjana Hirschmugl;Savas Kansoy;Kaan Boztug;Necil Kutukculer
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
314 views DOI Abstract
2014
increased il-17, a pathogenic link between hepatosplenic schistosomiasis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a hypothesis
;Oswald Moling;Alfonsina Di Summa;Loredana Capone;Josef Stuefer;Andrea Piccin;Alessandra Porzia;Antonella Capozzi;Maurizio Sorice;Raffaella Binazzi;Lathá Gandini;Giovanni Rimenti;Peter Mian
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
294 views DOI Abstract
2016
tranexamic acid: an exceedingly rare cause of anaphylaxis during anaesthesia
;R. A. Bansal;A. Nicholas;A. S. Bansal
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
275 views DOI Abstract
2015
hereditary angioedema and gastrointestinal complications: an extensive review of the literature
;Napoleon Patel;Lisbet D. Suarez;Sakshi Kapur;Leonard Bielory
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
260 views DOI Abstract
2012
visceral leishmaniasis or systemic lupus erythematosus flare?
;Sunny Garg;Mousumi Kundu;Amit Nandan Dhar Dwivedi;Lalit Prashant Meena;Neeraj Varyani;Asif Iqbal;Kamlakar Tripathi
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
245 views DOI Abstract
2014
recurrent skin and lung infections in autosomal dominant hyper ige syndrome with transactivation domain stat3 mutation
;Chad J. Cooper;Sarmad Said;German T. Hernandez
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
209 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Below Average
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.