American Journal of Hypertension | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1978 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
85
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

American Journal of Hypertension

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim sci
Short Name American Journal of Hypertension
Abbreviated Name am j hypertens
ISSN 1941-7225
Aim and Scope
URL http://ajh.oxfordjournals.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (22 total)

2019
Determinants of increased central excess pressure in dialysis: role of dialysis modality and arteriovenous fistula.
Paré, Mathilde;Goupil, Rémi;Fortier, Catherine;Mac-Way, Fabrice;Madore, François;Marquis, Karine;Hametner, Bernhard;Wassertheurer, Siegfried;Schultz, Martin G;Sharman, James E;Agharazii, Mohsen;
292 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nocturnal Hypertension and Nondipping Blood Pressure: Nature or Nurture?
Ferdinand, Keith C;Sweeney, Aaron W;
Vol. 32 , No. 8 , pp. 720-722
243 views DOI
2017
Å skape et begrep om jam i utforskningen av en deleuziansk metode-ontologi
;Ola Harstad
Vol. 1 , pp. 28-42
224 views DOI Abstract
2018
animasjon som multimodal analyse av fortelleruttrykk i barnehagen
;Ingvild Olsen Olaussen
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 108-122
216 views DOI Abstract
2017
en musikers møte med de yngste barna i barnehagen
;Morten Sæther
Vol. 1 , pp. 21-39
214 views DOI Abstract
2017
et temanummer som undersøker hva det innebærer å forske med kunsten
;Tone Pernille Østern;Mari Ann Letnes
Vol. 1 , pp. 1-6
135 views DOI
2011
Abstracts from the Chinese Journal of Hypertension
No Author Found
Vol. 24 , No. 6 , pp. 731-731
47 views DOI
2005
Clinical measurement of arterial stiffness obtained from noninvasive pressure waveforms
W. Stephen Nichols
18 views DOI Abstract
2015
State of the Art Review: Depression, Stress, Anxiety, and Cardiovascular Disease
Beth E. Cohen, Donald Edmondson, Ian M. Kronish
14 views DOI Abstract
2008
Secular Trends in the Rates of Preeclampsia, Eclampsia, and Gestational Hypertension, United States, 1987-2004
Anne Wallis, Audrey F. Saftlas, J. Hsia, Hani K. Atrash
12 views DOI Abstract
View All 22 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
35
85
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

85.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.