Indexed in Journament

American Journal of Hypertension

ISSN 1941-7225· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #23,457 of 29,303 scored journals (34,041 indexed)
88 Articles
Scores higher than 19.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name American Journal of Hypertension
Abbreviated Name am j hypertens
ISSN 1941-7225
URL http://ajh.oxfordjournals.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for American Journal of Hypertension
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.2 30.6
Accessibility 20.0 23.5
Timeliness 100.0 3.1
Diversity 5.6 25.9
Innovation 10.5 24.1
Community Impact 5.0 6.9
Content Distribution 24.8 89.9
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (88)

2019
Determinants of increased central excess pressure in dialysis: role of dialysis modality and arteriovenous fistula.
364 views DOI Abstract
2018
animasjon som multimodal analyse av fortelleruttrykk i barnehagen
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 108-122
331 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nocturnal Hypertension and Nondipping Blood Pressure: Nature or Nurture?
Vol. 32 , No. 8 , pp. 720-722
314 views DOI
2017
Å skape et begrep om jam i utforskningen av en deleuziansk metode-ontologi
Vol. 1 , pp. 28-42
299 views DOI Abstract
2017
en musikers møte med de yngste barna i barnehagen
Vol. 1 , pp. 21-39
290 views DOI Abstract
2017
et temanummer som undersøker hva det innebærer å forske med kunsten
Vol. 1 , pp. 1-6
210 views DOI
2011
Abstracts from the Chinese Journal of Hypertension
Vol. 24 , No. 6 , pp. 731-731
123 views DOI
2008
Secular Trends in the Rates of Preeclampsia, Eclampsia, and Gestational Hypertension, United States, 1987-2004
79 views DOI Abstract
2015
State of the Art Review: Depression, Stress, Anxiety, and Cardiovascular Disease
74 views DOI Abstract
2026
Association of A Body Shape Index, But Not Body Mass Index, with Seated Arterial Stiffness Evaluated by Innovative Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
The mediating role of sleep blood pressure in the association between B-type natriuretic peptide and cardiovascular events: The Nagahama Study
18 views DOI Abstract
2026
Cost-effectiveness analysis of an mHealth intervention to improve hypertension control in patients with elevated cardiovascular risk
23 views DOI Abstract
2026
Association of Antihypertensive Medications with Orthostatic Hypotension among OIder Adults
26 views DOI Abstract
2026
Sucrose induces Cardiac Hypertrophy and Renal Perivascular Fibrosis in a Novel Mouse Model of Hypertension
62 views DOI Abstract
2026
Amlodipine and Nifedipine Associations with B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Women with Hypertension and Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
18 views DOI Abstract
2026
Role of office standardized blood pressure measurement model on hypertension screening in Shanghai community
27 views DOI Abstract
2026
A comparative analysis of hypertension prevalence and features in sitting versus supine positions in rural areas of Liaoning Province
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
Telmisartan–Chlorthalidone Fixed-Dose Combination at Two Chlorthalidone Dose Levels versus Telmisartan in Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Phase III Trial
26 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #23,457 of 29,303 scored
(34,041 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

10.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

24.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.