Indexed in Journament

American Journal of Hypertension

ISSN 1941-7225· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,566 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
66 Articles
Scores higher than 9.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name American Journal of Hypertension
Abbreviated Name am j hypertens
ISSN 1941-7225
URL http://ajh.oxfordjournals.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 90.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 10.5 25.7
Community Impact 7.1 5.8
Content Distribution 15.1 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (66)

2019
Determinants of increased central excess pressure in dialysis: role of dialysis modality and arteriovenous fistula.
Paré, Mathilde;Goupil, Rémi;Fortier, Catherine;Mac-Way, Fabrice;Madore, François;Marquis, Karine;Hametner, Bernhard;Wassertheurer, Siegfried;Schultz, Martin G;Sharman, James E;Agharazii, Mohsen;
329 views DOI Abstract
2018
animasjon som multimodal analyse av fortelleruttrykk i barnehagen
;Ingvild Olsen Olaussen
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 108-122
279 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nocturnal Hypertension and Nondipping Blood Pressure: Nature or Nurture?
Ferdinand, Keith C;Sweeney, Aaron W;
Vol. 32 , No. 8 , pp. 720-722
273 views DOI
2017
Å skape et begrep om jam i utforskningen av en deleuziansk metode-ontologi
;Ola Harstad
Vol. 1 , pp. 28-42
260 views DOI Abstract
2017
en musikers møte med de yngste barna i barnehagen
;Morten Sæther
Vol. 1 , pp. 21-39
245 views DOI Abstract
2017
et temanummer som undersøker hva det innebærer å forske med kunsten
;Tone Pernille Østern;Mari Ann Letnes
Vol. 1 , pp. 1-6
169 views DOI
2011
Abstracts from the Chinese Journal of Hypertension
No Author Found
Vol. 24 , No. 6 , pp. 731-731
80 views DOI
2005
Clinical measurement of arterial stiffness obtained from noninvasive pressure waveforms
W. Stephen Nichols
49 views DOI Abstract
2008
Secular Trends in the Rates of Preeclampsia, Eclampsia, and Gestational Hypertension, United States, 1987-2004
Anne Wallis, Audrey F. Saftlas, J. Hsia, Hani K. Atrash
43 views DOI Abstract
2015
State of the Art Review: Depression, Stress, Anxiety, and Cardiovascular Disease
Beth E. Cohen, Donald Edmondson, Ian M. Kronish
38 views DOI Abstract
2026
Associations of Program Adherence and Motivation with Blood Pressure Reduction in a Digital Therapeutic for Hypertension: The B-INDEX Study
Naoko Tomitani, Tomoko Morimoto, Noriko Harada, Satoshi Hoshide, Kazuomi Kario
DOI Abstract
2026
24-hour Blood Pressure Variability and Falls Among Older Adults with Hypertension Taking Antihypertensive Medication: Results from the AMBROSIA Study
Keisuke Narita, Rong Wei, Teresa N Harrison, Kimberly Cannavale, Lei Qian, C Barrett Bowling, Paul Muntner, Joseph E. Schwartz, John J. Sim, Daichi Shimbo, Kristi Reynolds
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Implementation of Clinical Hypertension Guidelines and Single Pill Combinations: A Qualitative Study in Australian General Practice
Sonali R Gnanenthiran, Isabella Tan, Miriam Pikkemaat, Mingjuan Zeng, C. Hespe, Markus P Schlaich, Anthony Rodgers, Aletta E Schutte
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
Brief Office Sodium Screener: Assessing Sodium Intake from High Sodium Foods in the Outpatient Setting
Siya Bhagat, Laura Harnish, Susan Devaraj, Valerie Marcellus, Blaise Abramovitz, Evan C. Ray, Matthew F. Muldoon
6 views DOI Abstract
2026
School-based blood pressure measurement and its association with left ventricular mass index among adolescents in urban Tanzania
M K Nsanya, R N Peck, T S Masoza, P Ayieko, E C Nyanza, S H Kapiga, C Cichowitz
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
Application of Framing Effects of Health Promotion Information in Hypertension Management
Li Xiaofang, Lu Qingwei, Yan Xin, Wang Jinglei, Zhou Wenkao, Li Xiaohong
17 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Association Between Metabolic Score for Insulin Resistance and the Risk of Hypertension
Chen Yuang, Song Yue, Changqiang Yang
17 views DOI Abstract
2026
Blood pressure Time in Target Range and Clinical Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease
M Rahman, Z Chen, M Dweekat, M Wang
27 views DOI Abstract
2026
Association of nocturnal hypertension, non-dipping, and exaggerated morning surge with home blood pressure monitoring: The HI-JAMP Study
Naoko Tomitani, Satoshi Hoshide, Kazuomi Kario
17 views DOI Abstract
2026
A 25-YEAR LONGITUDINAL GENDER-BASED STUDY ON LEFT VENTRICULAR GEOMETRY TRACKING IN THE GENERAL POPULATION: THE PAMELA STUDY
Cesare Cuspidi, Rita Facchetti, Marijana Tadić, Elisa Gherbesi, Giuseppe Mancia, Guido Grassi
22 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
25.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,566 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

25.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

10.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

15.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.